SFTY vs. JAPN
SFTY (Horizon Managed Risk ETF) and JAPN (Horizon Kinetics Japan Owner Operator ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SFTY is a Tactical Allocation fund managed by Horizon, while JAPN is a Japan Equities fund actively managed by Horizon. Over the past year, SFTY returned 21.14% vs -8.90% for JAPN. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SFTY charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for JAPN.
Performance
SFTY vs. JAPN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SFTY achieves a 9.81% return, which is significantly higher than JAPN's -3.93% return.
SFTY
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- 1.41%
- 6M
- 7.64%
- YTD
- 9.81%
- 1Y
- 21.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JAPN
- 1D
- 1.83%
- 1M
- 10.24%
- 6M
- -6.01%
- YTD
- -3.93%
- 1Y
- -8.90%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SFTY vs. JAPN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SFTY Horizon Managed Risk ETF | 9.81% | 12.10% |
JAPN Horizon Kinetics Japan Owner Operator ETF | -3.93% | -7.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between SFTY and JAPN is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SFTY vs. JAPN — Risk / Return Rank
SFTY
JAPN
SFTY vs. JAPN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Managed Risk ETF (SFTY) and Horizon Kinetics Japan Owner Operator ETF (JAPN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SFTY | JAPN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 0.94 | +0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.46 | -0.37 | +2.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.99 | -0.63 | +11.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SFTY vs. JAPN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SFTY drawdown since its inception was -8.64%, smaller than the maximum JAPN drawdown of -23.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFTY and JAPN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SFTY | JAPN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.64% | -23.94% | +15.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.64% | -23.94% | +15.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.71% | -14.55% | +13.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.13% | -10.45% | +9.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.93% | 14.21% | -12.28% |
Volatility
SFTY vs. JAPN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Horizon Managed Risk ETF (SFTY) is 3.58%, while Horizon Kinetics Japan Owner Operator ETF (JAPN) has a volatility of 5.73%. This indicates that SFTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JAPN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SFTY | JAPN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.58% | 5.73% | -2.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.45% | 16.82% | -7.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.03% | 19.94% | -7.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.90% | 19.77% | -7.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.90% | 19.77% | -7.87% |
SFTY vs. JAPN - Expense Ratio Comparison
SFTY has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than JAPN's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
SFTY vs. JAPN - Dividend Comparison
SFTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than JAPN's 0.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
JAPN Horizon Kinetics Japan Owner Operator ETF | 0.25% | 0.24% |
SFTY Horizon Managed Risk ETF | 0.17% | 0.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SFTY and JAPN have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JAPN has higher volatility (5.73%) compared to SFTY (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFTY dropped -8.64% vs JAPN's -23.94%.
On 1-year performance, SFTY leads with 21.14% vs -8.90% for JAPN. On fees, SFTY is cheaper at 0.77% per year. On volatility, SFTY has been the lower-risk option at 3.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SFTY has performed better with a 21.14% return vs -8.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SFTY is cheaper with a 0.77% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for JAPN.
JAPN has the higher dividend yield at 0.25%, compared with 0.17% for SFTY.
SFTY is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while JAPN is Japan Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.77% for SFTY and 0.85% for JAPN.
SFTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs -0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SFTY and JAPN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer