TBFG vs. AOM

In the year-to-date period, TBFG achieves a 0.90% return, which is significantly lower than AOM's 3.67% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

TBFG has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than AOM's 0.25% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF (TBFG) and iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current TBFG Sharpe Ratio is 0.39, which is lower than the AOM Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBFG and AOM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

TBFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, less than AOM's 3.06% yield.

The maximum TBFG drawdown since its inception was -13.42%, smaller than the maximum AOM drawdown of -19.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBFG and AOM.

The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF (TBFG) has a higher volatility of 2.35% compared to iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM) at 1.85%. This indicates that TBFG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.