SFLO vs. QQQS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SFLO (Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF) and QQQS (Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds - SFLO tracks the Victory US Small Cap Free Cash Flow Index while QQQS tracks the Nasdaq Innovators Completion Cap Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SFLO returned 32.02% vs 79.99% for QQQS. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SFLO charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for QQQS.

Performance

SFLO vs. QQQS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF (SFLO) and Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SFLO achieves a 13.58% return, which is significantly lower than QQQS's 27.27% return.

SFLO

• 1D: -1.52%
• 1M: 1.28%
• YTD: 13.58%
• 6M: 12.24%
• 1Y: 32.02%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QQQS

• 1D: -1.70%
• 1M: 5.91%
• YTD: 27.27%
• 6M: 27.40%
• 1Y: 79.99%
• 3Y*: 15.89%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SFLO vs. QQQS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SFLO Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF	13.58%	11.88%	6.54%	-0.16%
QQQS Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF	27.27%	23.03%	10.20%	2.81%

Correlation

The correlation between SFLO and QQQS is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2023	0.75

The correlation between SFLO and QQQS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

SFLO vs. QQQS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SFLO	QQQS
Technology	25.6%	42.1%
Healthcare	18.0%	41.0%
Consumer Cyclical	16.9%	5.2%
Energy	14.8%	2.2%
Industrials	10.5%	4.8%
Communication Services	7.3%	2.4%
Consumer Defensive	5.1%	1.4%
Basic Materials	1.6%	1.0%
Financial Services	0.3%	0.0%
Utilities	0.1%	-
Real Estate	0.1%	-

Return for Risk

SFLO vs. QQQS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SFLO

SFLO Risk / Return Rank: 63
SFLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
SFLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
SFLO Omega Ratio Rank: 51
SFLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
SFLO Martin Ratio Rank: 73

QQQS

QQQS Risk / Return Rank: 85
QQQS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
QQQS Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
QQQS Omega Ratio Rank: 73
QQQS Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
QQQS Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SFLO vs. QQQS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF (SFLO) and Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SFLO	QQQS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.87	3.00	-1.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.72	3.78	-1.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.44	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.12	5.90	-1.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.73	19.70	-5.97
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SFLO vs. QQQS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SFLO Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is lower than the QQQS Sharpe Ratio of 3.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SFLO and QQQS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SFLO	QQQS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.87	3.00	-1.13
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.64	0.63	+0.02

Drawdowns

SFLO vs. QQQS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SFLO drawdown since its inception was -26.63%, smaller than the maximum QQQS drawdown of -38.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFLO and QQQS.

Drawdown Indicators

	SFLO	QQQS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.63%	-38.06%	+11.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.80%	-13.63%	+5.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-34.32%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.70%	-2.55%	-0.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.33%	-13.26%	+8.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.34%	4.07%	-1.73%

Volatility

SFLO vs. QQQS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF (SFLO) is 5.26%, while Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS) has a volatility of 7.39%. This indicates that SFLO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SFLO	QQQS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.26%	7.39%	-2.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.45%	18.49%	-7.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.30%	26.90%	-9.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.55%	28.34%	-7.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.55%	28.34%	-7.79%

SFLO vs. QQQS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SFLO has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQS's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

SFLO vs. QQQS - Dividend Comparison

SFLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than QQQS's 2.73% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
QQQS Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF	2.73%	3.48%	0.80%	0.68%	0.04%
SFLO Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF	0.85%	1.04%	1.28%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SFLO and QQQS in my portfolio?

SFLO and QQQS have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SFLO or QQQS?

QQQS has higher volatility (7.39%) compared to SFLO (5.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFLO dropped -26.63% vs QQQS's -38.06%.

Which ETF is better, SFLO or QQQS?

On 1-year performance, QQQS leads with 79.99% vs 32.02% for SFLO. On fees, QQQS is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, SFLO has been the lower-risk option at 5.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SFLO or QQQS?

Over the 1-year period, QQQS has performed better with a 79.99% return vs 32.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SFLO or QQQS?

QQQS is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for SFLO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SFLO or QQQS?

QQQS has the higher dividend yield at 2.73%, compared with 0.85% for SFLO.

What is the main difference between SFLO and QQQS?

SFLO tracks Victory US Small Cap Free Cash Flow Index, while QQQS tracks Nasdaq Innovators Completion Cap Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: Victory and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for SFLO and 0.20% for QQQS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.