SFLO vs. CALF
SFLO (Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF) and CALF (Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds - SFLO tracks the Victory US Small Cap Free Cash Flow Index while CALF tracks the Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SFLO returned 37.07% vs 34.08% for CALF. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SFLO charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for CALF.
Performance
SFLO vs. CALF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SFLO having a 15.33% return and CALF slightly lower at 14.62%.
SFLO
- 1D
- -1.19%
- 1M
- 2.87%
- YTD
- 15.33%
- 6M
- 16.37%
- 1Y
- 37.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CALF
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- 5.29%
- YTD
- 14.62%
- 6M
- 15.37%
- 1Y
- 34.08%
- 3Y*
- 11.10%
- 5Y*
- 4.41%
- 10Y*
- —
SFLO vs. CALF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SFLO Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF | 15.33% | 11.88% | 6.54% | -0.16% |
CALF Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF | 14.62% | 2.33% | -7.41% | 0.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between SFLO and CALF is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2023 | 0.93 |
The correlation between SFLO and CALF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
SFLO vs. CALF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SFLO
CALF
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Utilities
-
Real Estate
Technology
SFLO
CALF
Healthcare
SFLO
CALF
Consumer Cyclical
SFLO
CALF
Energy
SFLO
CALF
Industrials
SFLO
CALF
Communication Services
SFLO
CALF
Consumer Defensive
SFLO
CALF
Basic Materials
SFLO
CALF
Financial Services
SFLO
CALF
Utilities
SFLO
CALF
-
Real Estate
SFLO
CALF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SFLO vs. CALF — Risk / Return Rank
SFLO
CALF
SFLO vs. CALF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF (SFLO) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SFLO | CALF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.16 | 2.17 | -0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.10 | 3.14 | -0.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.38 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.78 | 5.53 | -0.75 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.98 | 15.82 | +0.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SFLO | CALF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.16 | 2.17 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.19 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.38 | +0.30 |
Drawdowns
SFLO vs. CALF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SFLO drawdown since its inception was -26.63%, smaller than the maximum CALF drawdown of -47.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFLO and CALF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SFLO | CALF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.63% | -47.58% | +20.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.80% | -6.15% | -1.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -34.22% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.19% | -0.84% | -0.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.34% | -10.74% | +6.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.33% | 2.15% | +0.18% |
Volatility
SFLO vs. CALF - Volatility Comparison
Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF (SFLO) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF) have volatilities of 4.99% and 4.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SFLO | CALF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.99% | 4.83% | +0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.34% | 10.40% | +0.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.22% | 15.79% | +1.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.54% | 23.44% | -2.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.54% | 26.02% | -5.48% |
SFLO vs. CALF - Expense Ratio Comparison
SFLO has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than CALF's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
SFLO vs. CALF - Dividend Comparison
SFLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than CALF's 1.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CALF Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF | 1.26% | 1.43% | 1.07% | 1.18% | 0.85% | 2.63% | 0.82% | 0.99% | 1.39% | 0.70% |
SFLO Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF | 0.83% | 1.04% | 1.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, SFLO and CALF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SFLO has higher volatility (4.99%) compared to CALF (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFLO dropped -26.63% vs CALF's -47.58%.
On 1-year performance, SFLO leads with 37.07% vs 34.08% for CALF. On fees, SFLO is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, CALF has been the lower-risk option at 4.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SFLO has performed better with a 37.07% return vs 34.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SFLO is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for CALF.
CALF has the higher dividend yield at 1.26%, compared with 0.83% for SFLO.
SFLO tracks Victory US Small Cap Free Cash Flow Index, while CALF tracks Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Index. They also come from different issuers: Victory and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for SFLO and 0.59% for CALF.
CALF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SFLO and CALF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer