SFLO vs. COWZ
Compare and contrast key facts about Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF (SFLO) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ).
SFLO and COWZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SFLO is a passively managed fund by VictoryShares that tracks the performance of the Victory US Small Cap Free Cash Flow Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2023. COWZ is a passively managed fund by Pacer Advisors that tracks the performance of the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 2016. Both SFLO and COWZ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SFLO or COWZ.
Key characteristics
| SFLO | COWZ | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 5.40% | 10.85% |
| Daily Std Dev | 18.10% | 14.09% |
| Max Drawdown | -10.44% | -38.63% |
| Current Drawdown | -5.75% | -1.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between SFLO and COWZ is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
SFLO vs. COWZ - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, SFLO achieves a 5.40% return, which is significantly lower than COWZ's 10.85% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SFLO vs. COWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SFLO and COWZ have an expense ratio of 0.49%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SFLO vs. COWZ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF (SFLO) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Not enough dataDividends
SFLO vs. COWZ - Dividend Comparison
SFLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than COWZ's 2.00% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SFLO Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF | 0.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 2.00% | 1.92% | 1.96% | 1.48% | 2.54% | 1.96% | 1.67% | 1.95% | 0.13% |
Drawdowns
SFLO vs. COWZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SFLO drawdown since its inception was -10.44%, smaller than the maximum COWZ drawdown of -38.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFLO and COWZ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SFLO vs. COWZ - Volatility Comparison
Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF (SFLO) has a higher volatility of 6.15% compared to Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) at 4.33%. This indicates that SFLO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.