PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SFLO vs. ECML
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SFLO vs. ECML - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF (SFLO) and EA Series Trust - Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF (ECML). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SFLO vs. ECML - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SFLO
Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF
1.98%11.88%6.54%-0.16%
ECML
EA Series Trust - Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF
8.76%6.82%2.37%0.26%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SFLO achieves a 1.98% return, which is significantly lower than ECML's 8.76% return.


SFLO

1D
2.11%
1M
-1.01%
YTD
1.98%
6M
3.58%
1Y
23.72%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ECML

1D
1.57%
1M
-1.96%
YTD
8.76%
6M
10.66%
1Y
20.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SFLO vs. ECML - Expense Ratio Comparison

SFLO has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than ECML's 0.95% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SFLO vs. ECML — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SFLO
SFLO Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
SFLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFLO Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SFLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFLO Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

ECML
ECML Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
ECML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ECML Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
ECML Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
ECML Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
ECML Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SFLO vs. ECML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF (SFLO) and EA Series Trust - Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF (ECML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SFLOECMLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.99

1.05

-0.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.51

1.62

-0.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.21

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.37

1.61

-0.24

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.91

6.01

-0.10

SFLO vs. ECML - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SFLO Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is comparable to the ECML Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SFLO and ECML, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SFLOECMLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

1.05

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.79

-0.36

Correlation

The correlation between SFLO and ECML is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

SFLO vs. ECML - Dividend Comparison

SFLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than ECML's 1.26% yield.


TTM202520242023
SFLO
Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF
0.95%1.04%1.28%0.00%
ECML
EA Series Trust - Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF
1.26%1.38%0.98%0.77%

Drawdowns

SFLO vs. ECML - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SFLO drawdown since its inception was -26.63%, which is greater than ECML's maximum drawdown of -24.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFLO and ECML.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SFLOECMLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.63%

-24.66%

-1.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.83%

-12.96%

-3.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.89%

-2.69%

+0.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.59%

-6.19%

+1.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.90%

3.48%

+0.42%

Volatility

SFLO vs. ECML - Volatility Comparison

Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF (SFLO) has a higher volatility of 4.74% compared to EA Series Trust - Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF (ECML) at 4.48%. This indicates that SFLO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ECML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SFLOECMLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.74%

4.48%

+0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.01%

10.17%

+1.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.98%

19.29%

+4.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.81%

18.69%

+2.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.81%

18.69%

+2.12%