SFLO vs. MODL

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SFLO (Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF) and MODL (Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SFLO is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Victory US Small Cap Free Cash Flow Index, while MODL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Victory. SFLO is passively managed, while MODL is actively managed. Over the past year, SFLO returned 28.87% vs 20.59% for MODL. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SFLO charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for MODL.

Performance

SFLO vs. MODL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF (SFLO) and Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF (MODL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SFLO achieves a 12.77% return, which is significantly higher than MODL's 5.53% return.

SFLO

• 1D: 0.86%
• 1M: 0.50%
• YTD: 12.77%
• 6M: 11.84%
• 1Y: 28.87%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MODL

• 1D: -1.03%
• 1M: -0.90%
• YTD: 5.53%
• 6M: 4.79%
• 1Y: 20.59%
• 3Y*: 18.77%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SFLO vs. MODL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SFLO Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF	12.77%	11.88%	6.54%	0.27%
MODL Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF	5.53%	18.99%	24.73%	1.57%

Correlation

The correlation between SFLO and MODL is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 21, 2023	0.58

The correlation between SFLO and MODL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

SFLO vs. MODL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SFLO	MODL
Technology	28.1%	32.6%
Healthcare	18.9%	14.8%
Consumer Cyclical	17.2%	5.1%
Energy	13.4%	0.0%
Industrials	9.1%	4.1%
Communication Services	7.0%	15.5%
Consumer Defensive	4.4%	0.0%
Basic Materials	1.7%	4.2%
Financial Services	0.2%	18.3%
Utilities	0.1%	4.3%
Real Estate	0.1%	-

Return for Risk

SFLO vs. MODL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SFLO

SFLO Risk / Return Rank: 60
SFLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
SFLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
SFLO Omega Ratio Rank: 48
SFLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
SFLO Martin Ratio Rank: 69

MODL

MODL Risk / Return Rank: 55
MODL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
MODL Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
MODL Omega Ratio Rank: 55
MODL Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
MODL Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SFLO vs. MODL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF (SFLO) and Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF (MODL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SFLO	MODL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.67	1.77	-0.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.43	2.50	-0.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.32	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.72	2.19	+1.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.95	9.63	+2.32

SFLO vs. MODL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SFLO Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the MODL Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SFLO and MODL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SFLO vs. MODL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SFLO drawdown since its inception was -26.63%, which is greater than MODL's maximum drawdown of -17.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFLO and MODL.

Drawdown Indicators

	SFLO	MODL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.63%	-17.60%	-9.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.80%	-9.46%	+1.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-17.60%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.39%	-2.29%	-1.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.29%	-2.03%	-2.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.42%	2.14%	+0.28%

Volatility

SFLO vs. MODL - Volatility Comparison

Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF (SFLO) has a higher volatility of 5.20% compared to Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF (MODL) at 4.38%. This indicates that SFLO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MODL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SFLO	MODL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.20%	4.38%	+0.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.67%	9.18%	+2.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.37%	11.69%	+5.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.45%	14.64%	+5.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.45%	14.64%	+5.81%

SFLO vs. MODL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SFLO has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than MODL's 0.46% expense ratio.

Dividends

SFLO vs. MODL - Dividend Comparison

SFLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, more than MODL's 0.73% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
MODL Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF	0.73%	0.67%	0.83%	1.02%	0.39%
SFLO Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF	0.82%	1.04%	1.28%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SFLO and MODL in my portfolio?

SFLO and MODL have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SFLO or MODL?

SFLO has higher volatility (5.20%) compared to MODL (4.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFLO dropped -26.63% vs MODL's -17.60%.

Which ETF is better, SFLO or MODL?

On 1-year performance, SFLO leads with 28.87% vs 20.59% for MODL. On fees, MODL is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, MODL has been the lower-risk option at 4.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SFLO or MODL?

Over the 1-year period, SFLO has performed better with a 28.87% return vs 20.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SFLO or MODL?

MODL is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for SFLO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SFLO or MODL?

SFLO has the higher dividend yield at 0.82%, compared with 0.73% for MODL.

What is the main difference between SFLO and MODL?

SFLO is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while MODL is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for SFLO and 0.46% for MODL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MODL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.