SFLO vs. MODL

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF (SFLO) and Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF (MODL).

SFLO and MODL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SFLO is a passively managed fund by Victory that tracks the performance of the Victory US Small Cap Free Cash Flow Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2023. MODL is an actively managed fund by Victory. It was launched on Oct 11, 2022.

Performance

SFLO vs. MODL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF (SFLO) and Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF (MODL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SFLO vs. MODL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SFLO Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF	1.98%	11.88%	6.54%	-0.16%
MODL Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF	-5.81%	18.99%	24.73%	0.69%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SFLO achieves a 1.98% return, which is significantly higher than MODL's -5.81% return.

SFLO

• 1D: 2.11%
• 1M: -1.01%
• YTD: 1.98%
• 6M: 3.58%
• 1Y: 23.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MODL

• 1D: 2.63%
• 1M: -5.37%
• YTD: -5.81%
• 6M: -2.92%
• 1Y: 16.01%
• 3Y*: 16.98%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SFLO vs. MODL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SFLO has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than MODL's 0.46% expense ratio.

SFLO

Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF

MODL

Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF

Return for Risk

SFLO vs. MODL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SFLO

SFLO Risk / Return Rank: 58
SFLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
SFLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
SFLO Omega Ratio Rank: 58
SFLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
SFLO Martin Ratio Rank: 60

MODL

MODL Risk / Return Rank: 58
MODL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
MODL Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
MODL Omega Ratio Rank: 58
MODL Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
MODL Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SFLO vs. MODL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF (SFLO) and Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF (MODL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SFLO	MODL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.99	0.95	+0.05
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.51	1.46	+0.05
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.22	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.37	1.52	-0.15
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.91	6.60	-0.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SFLO vs. MODL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SFLO Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is comparable to the MODL Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SFLO and MODL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SFLO	MODL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99	0.95	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.43	1.33	-0.90

Correlation

The correlation between SFLO and MODL is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

SFLO vs. MODL - Dividend Comparison

SFLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, more than MODL's 0.76% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
SFLO Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF	0.95%	1.04%	1.28%	0.00%	0.00%
MODL Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF	0.76%	0.67%	0.83%	1.02%	0.39%

Drawdowns

SFLO vs. MODL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SFLO drawdown since its inception was -26.63%, which is greater than MODL's maximum drawdown of -17.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFLO and MODL.

Drawdown Indicators

	SFLO	MODL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.63%	-17.60%	-9.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.83%	-10.88%	-5.95%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.89%	-7.03%	+5.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.59%	-2.09%	-2.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.90%	2.51%	+1.39%

Volatility

SFLO vs. MODL - Volatility Comparison

Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF (SFLO) and Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF (MODL) have volatilities of 4.74% and 4.86%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SFLO	MODL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.74%	4.86%	-0.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.01%	8.66%	+3.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.98%	17.01%	+6.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.81%	14.73%	+6.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.81%	14.73%	+6.08%