MODL vs. PRWCX

In the year-to-date period, MODL achieves a 25.90% return, which is significantly higher than PRWCX's 13.21% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

MODL has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than PRWCX's 0.68% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF (MODL) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund (PRWCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current MODL Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the PRWCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MODL and PRWCX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

MODL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than PRWCX's 10.31% yield.

The maximum MODL drawdown since its inception was -10.05%, smaller than the maximum PRWCX drawdown of -45.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MODL and PRWCX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF (MODL) has a higher volatility of 3.62% compared to T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund (PRWCX) at 2.32%. This indicates that MODL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRWCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.