PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MODL vs. BDGS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MODL and BDGS is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.7

Performance

MODL vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF (MODL) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%35.00%40.00%45.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
41.19%
29.31%
MODL
BDGS

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MODL:

2.31

BDGS:

4.50

Sortino Ratio

MODL:

3.07

BDGS:

8.68

Omega Ratio

MODL:

1.41

BDGS:

2.63

Calmar Ratio

MODL:

3.58

BDGS:

8.26

Martin Ratio

MODL:

15.38

BDGS:

48.12

Ulcer Index

MODL:

1.81%

BDGS:

0.41%

Daily Std Dev

MODL:

12.07%

BDGS:

4.38%

Max Drawdown

MODL:

-10.05%

BDGS:

-5.38%

Current Drawdown

MODL:

-2.63%

BDGS:

-0.98%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MODL achieves a 25.90% return, which is significantly higher than BDGS's 19.39% return.


MODL

YTD

25.90%

1M

0.85%

6M

9.26%

1Y

26.77%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

BDGS

YTD

19.39%

1M

2.07%

6M

14.30%

1Y

19.56%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MODL vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

MODL has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.85% expense ratio.


BDGS
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF
Expense ratio chart for BDGS: current value at 0.85% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.85%
Expense ratio chart for MODL: current value at 0.46% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.46%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MODL vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF (MODL) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MODL, currently valued at 2.31, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.314.50
The chart of Sortino ratio for MODL, currently valued at 3.07, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.003.078.68
The chart of Omega ratio for MODL, currently valued at 1.41, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.412.63
The chart of Calmar ratio for MODL, currently valued at 3.58, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.003.588.26
The chart of Martin ratio for MODL, currently valued at 15.38, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0015.3848.12
MODL
BDGS

The current MODL Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is lower than the BDGS Sharpe Ratio of 4.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MODL and BDGS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.002.003.004.005.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
2.31
4.50
MODL
BDGS

Dividends

MODL vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

MODL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, while BDGS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20232022
MODL
Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF
0.84%1.03%0.39%
BDGS
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF
0.00%0.84%0.00%

Drawdowns

MODL vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MODL drawdown since its inception was -10.05%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -5.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MODL and BDGS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-2.63%
-0.98%
MODL
BDGS

Volatility

MODL vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison

Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF (MODL) has a higher volatility of 3.62% compared to Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) at 1.38%. This indicates that MODL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
3.62%
1.38%
MODL
BDGS
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab