PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MODL vs. VEA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MODL vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF (MODL) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MODL achieves a 7.88% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 13.84% return.


MODL

1D
0.24%
1M
-0.44%
6M
7.19%
YTD
7.88%
1Y
19.08%
3Y*
18.29%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
21.70%

VEA

1D
-0.66%
1M
-0.27%
6M
7.42%
YTD
13.84%
1Y
29.71%
3Y*
18.08%
5Y*
9.76%
10Y*
10.05%
ALL TIME*
5.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.69M$2.90M$3.17M
$674.44M$796.70M$806.62M

MODL vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
MODL
Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF
7.88%18.99%24.73%23.74%6.45%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
13.84%35.16%3.15%17.93%17.04%

Correlation

The correlation between MODL and VEA is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2022

0.71

The correlation between MODL and VEA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

MODL vs. VEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MODL
VEA

Technology

32.3%
18.4%

Financial Services

20.2%
23.1%

Healthcare

18.3%
7.9%

Communication Services

9.7%
3.2%

Utilities

5.0%
3.1%

Consumer Cyclical

4.9%
7.3%

Basic Materials

4.6%
6.9%

Industrials

4.6%
17.9%

Energy

0.0%
4.5%

Consumer Defensive

0.0%
5.3%

Real Estate

-

2.5%

Technology

MODL
32.3%
VEA
18.4%

Financial Services

MODL
20.2%
VEA
23.1%

Healthcare

MODL
18.3%
VEA
7.9%

Communication Services

MODL
9.7%
VEA
3.2%

Utilities

MODL
5.0%
VEA
3.1%

Consumer Cyclical

MODL
4.9%
VEA
7.3%

Basic Materials

MODL
4.6%
VEA
6.9%

Industrials

MODL
4.6%
VEA
17.9%

Energy

MODL
0.0%
VEA
4.5%

Consumer Defensive

MODL
0.0%
VEA
5.3%

Real Estate

MODL

-

VEA
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MODL vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MODL
MODL Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
MODL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MODL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
MODL Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
MODL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
MODL Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MODL vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF (MODL) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MODLVEADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.31

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

2.53

-0.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.00

9.44

-1.44

MODL vs. VEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MODL Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the VEA Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MODL and VEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MODL vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MODL drawdown since its inception was -17.60%, smaller than the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MODL and VEA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MODLVEADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.60%

-60.68%

+43.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.46%

-11.63%

+2.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.60%

-13.45%

-4.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.20%

-2.45%

+1.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.00%

-13.20%

+11.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.18%

3.10%

-0.92%

Volatility

MODL vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF (MODL) is 3.09%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a volatility of 5.40%. This indicates that MODL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MODLVEADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.09%

5.40%

-2.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.32%

15.40%

-6.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.88%

17.25%

-5.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.53%

16.84%

-2.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.53%

17.21%

-2.68%

MODL vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

MODL has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

MODL vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

MODL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, less than VEA's 2.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MODL
Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF
0.70%0.67%0.83%1.02%0.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.57%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


MODL and VEA have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VEA has higher volatility (5.40%) compared to MODL (3.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MODL dropped -17.60% vs VEA's -60.68%.

On 3-year performance, MODL leads with 18.29% vs 18.08% for VEA. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, MODL has been the lower-risk option at 3.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, MODL has performed better with a 18.29% return vs 18.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for MODL.

VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.57%, compared with 0.70% for MODL.

MODL is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VEA is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: Victory and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for MODL and 0.03% for VEA.

VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MODL and VEA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer