PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEI vs. ANAB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SEI vs. ANAB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc (SEI) and AnaptysBio, Inc. (ANAB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SEI having a 57.74% return and ANAB slightly higher at 58.91%.


SEI

1D
4.06%
1M
-0.85%
YTD
57.74%
6M
35.54%
1Y
143.14%
3Y*
111.29%
5Y*
52.77%
10Y*

ANAB

1D
1.97%
1M
-25.92%
YTD
58.91%
6M
73.08%
1Y
225.06%
3Y*
60.31%
5Y*
26.26%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEI vs. ANAB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SEI
Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc
57.74%62.29%277.66%-15.75%57.46%-15.55%-38.09%19.10%-43.06%85.37%
ANAB
AnaptysBio, Inc.
58.91%266.16%-38.19%-30.88%-10.82%61.63%32.31%-74.53%-36.67%283.11%

Correlation

The correlation between SEI and ANAB is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2017

0.17

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SEI:

$3.57B

ANAB:

$1.47B

EPS

SEI:

$1.03

ANAB:

-$0.91

PS Ratio

SEI:

4.71

ANAB:

6.51

PB Ratio

SEI:

4.58

ANAB:

115.60

Total Revenue (TTM)

SEI:

$692.11M

ANAB:

$232.39M

Gross Profit (TTM)

SEI:

$235.28M

ANAB:

$245.59M

EBITDA (TTM)

SEI:

$249.65M

ANAB:

$52.72M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEI vs. ANAB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEI
SEI Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
SEI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEI Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
SEI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEI Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

ANAB
ANAB Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
ANAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANAB Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
ANAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANAB Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEI vs. ANAB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc (SEI) and AnaptysBio, Inc. (ANAB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SEIANABDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.49

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.45

8.05

-2.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.72

20.07

-6.35

SEI vs. ANAB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEI Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is lower than the ANAB Sharpe Ratio of 3.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEI and ANAB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SEIANABDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.96

3.29

-1.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.40

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.23

+0.19

Drawdowns

SEI vs. ANAB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEI drawdown since its inception was -79.49%, smaller than the maximum ANAB drawdown of -92.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEI and ANAB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEIANABDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.49%

-92.08%

+12.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.43%

-28.15%

+1.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.37%

-69.32%

+13.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.37%

-69.32%

+13.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.95%

-40.07%

+32.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.65%

-64.71%

+26.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.55%

11.27%

-0.72%

Volatility

SEI vs. ANAB - Volatility Comparison

Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc (SEI) has a higher volatility of 17.54% compared to AnaptysBio, Inc. (ANAB) at 12.10%. This indicates that SEI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ANAB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEIANABDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.54%

12.10%

+5.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

51.78%

46.22%

+5.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

73.80%

68.91%

+4.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

66.56%

65.30%

+1.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

62.17%

75.47%

-13.30%

Dividends

SEI vs. ANAB - Dividend Comparison

SEI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, while ANAB has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
ANAB
AnaptysBio, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SEI
Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc
0.66%1.04%1.67%5.65%4.23%6.41%5.16%2.89%0.83%

Financials

SEI vs. ANAB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc and AnaptysBio, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M20222023202420252026
196.24M
25.56M
(SEI) Total Revenue
(ANAB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


SEI and ANAB have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SEI has higher volatility (17.54%) compared to ANAB (12.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEI dropped -79.49% vs ANAB's -92.08%.

ANAB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.29 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEI and ANAB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer