PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEF vs. MSTZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SEF vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Short Financials (SEF) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SEF vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SEF
ProShares Short Financials
11.27%-9.82%-5.81%
MSTZ
T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF
-27.23%-38.95%-94.26%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEF achieves a 11.27% return, which is significantly higher than MSTZ's -27.23% return.


SEF

1D
-2.13%
1M
3.96%
YTD
11.27%
6M
10.38%
1Y
2.76%
3Y*
-10.01%
5Y*
-6.70%
10Y*
-11.67%

MSTZ

1D
-5.53%
1M
-4.07%
YTD
-27.23%
6M
137.26%
1Y
-11.05%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SEF vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEF has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SEF vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEF
SEF Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
SEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEF Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
SEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEF Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

MSTZ
MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEF vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short Financials (SEF) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SEFMSTZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.14

-0.08

+0.22

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.36

1.02

-0.66

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.14

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.08

-0.12

+0.20

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.11

-0.17

+0.27

SEF vs. MSTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEF Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is higher than the MSTZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEF and MSTZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SEFMSTZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

-0.08

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.49

-0.53

+0.04

Correlation

The correlation between SEF and MSTZ is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

SEF vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison

SEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, while MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
SEF
ProShares Short Financials
3.27%4.33%5.72%4.43%0.39%0.00%0.12%1.25%0.41%
MSTZ
T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

SEF vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEF drawdown since its inception was -96.51%, roughly equal to the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEF and MSTZ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SEFMSTZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.51%

-99.36%

+2.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.21%

-83.20%

+62.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-96.00%

-97.45%

+1.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-82.58%

-93.91%

+11.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.44%

61.32%

-46.88%

Volatility

SEF vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Short Financials (SEF) is 4.86%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 38.43%. This indicates that SEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SEFMSTZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.86%

38.43%

-33.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.37%

122.48%

-111.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.28%

147.15%

-127.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.99%

173.11%

-155.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.55%

173.11%

-152.56%