SEA vs. POW

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

SEA (U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF) and POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SEA is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares. SEA is passively managed, while POW is actively managed. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SEA charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for POW.

Performance

SEA vs. POW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF (SEA) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEA achieves a 21.56% return, which is significantly lower than POW's 38.93% return.

SEA

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: -1.59%
• 6M: 15.11%
• YTD: 21.56%
• 1Y: 28.55%
• 3Y*: 16.20%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

POW

• 1D: -3.60%
• 1M: -8.76%
• 6M: 31.71%
• YTD: 38.93%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEA vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SEA U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF	21.56%	3.60%
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	38.93%	-1.70%

Correlation

The correlation between SEA and POW is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025	0.41

Return for Risk

SEA vs. POW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEA

SEA Risk / Return Rank: 66
SEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
SEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
SEA Omega Ratio Rank: 60
SEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
SEA Martin Ratio Rank: 68

POW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEA vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF (SEA) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SEA	POW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.69	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.44	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.69	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.78	—	—

Drawdowns

SEA vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEA drawdown since its inception was -39.53%, which is greater than POW's maximum drawdown of -18.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEA and POW.

Drawdown Indicators

	SEA	POW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.53%	-18.37%	-21.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.67%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.42%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.45%	-18.37%	+15.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.07%	-4.33%	-9.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.93%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SEA	POW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.03%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.13%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.98%	32.94%	-15.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.61%	32.94%	-11.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.61%	32.94%	-11.33%

SEA vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEA has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

SEA vs. POW - Dividend Comparison

SEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.56%, more than POW's 0.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	0.14%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SEA U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF	5.56%	6.76%	18.47%	9.85%	18.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SEA and POW in my portfolio?

SEA and POW have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SEA or POW?

On fees, SEA is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SEA or POW?

SEA is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for POW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SEA or POW?

SEA has the higher dividend yield at 5.56%, compared with 0.14% for POW.

What is the main difference between SEA and POW?

SEA is categorized as Industrials Equities, while POW is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: US Global and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SEA and 0.75% for POW.