SDOG vs. XLC
SDOG (ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF) and XLC (Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - SDOG is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S-Network Sector Dividend Dogs Index, while XLC is a Communications Equities fund tracking the S&P Communication Services Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SDOG returned 9.08%/yr vs 8.03%/yr for XLC. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SDOG charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for XLC.
Performance
SDOG vs. XLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SDOG achieves a 17.13% return, which is significantly higher than XLC's -4.85% return.
SDOG
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- 5.43%
- YTD
- 17.13%
- 6M
- 16.28%
- 1Y
- 27.16%
- 3Y*
- 16.38%
- 5Y*
- 9.08%
- 10Y*
- 9.99%
XLC
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -4.66%
- YTD
- -4.85%
- 6M
- -3.59%
- 1Y
- 10.19%
- 3Y*
- 21.60%
- 5Y*
- 8.03%
- 10Y*
- —
SDOG vs. XLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDOG ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF | 17.13% | 11.12% | 14.70% | 4.19% | -0.20% | 24.59% | -0.35% | 24.02% | -11.64% |
XLC Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund | -4.85% | 23.08% | 34.71% | 52.82% | -37.63% | 15.96% | 26.90% | 31.05% | -16.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between SDOG and XLC is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2018 | 0.54 |
The correlation between SDOG and XLC shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.55 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SDOG vs. XLC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SDOG
XLC
Consumer Cyclical
-
Technology
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Communication Services
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
SDOG
XLC
-
Technology
SDOG
XLC
Financial Services
SDOG
XLC
-
Healthcare
SDOG
XLC
-
Consumer Defensive
SDOG
XLC
-
Utilities
SDOG
XLC
-
Energy
SDOG
XLC
-
Communication Services
SDOG
XLC
Industrials
SDOG
XLC
-
Basic Materials
SDOG
XLC
-
Real Estate
SDOG
-
XLC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SDOG vs. XLC — Risk / Return Rank
SDOG
XLC
SDOG vs. XLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG) and Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SDOG | XLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.12 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.25 | 0.86 | +3.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.63 | 2.73 | +10.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SDOG vs. XLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDOG drawdown since its inception was -43.56%, smaller than the maximum XLC drawdown of -46.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDOG and XLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SDOG | XLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.56% | -46.65% | +3.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.24% | -10.57% | +4.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.00% | -17.97% | +1.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.84% | -46.65% | +26.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -6.72% | +6.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.91% | -10.58% | +5.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | 3.33% | -1.39% |
Volatility
SDOG vs. XLC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG) is 3.34%, while Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) has a volatility of 3.57%. This indicates that SDOG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SDOG | XLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.34% | 3.57% | -0.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.02% | 9.65% | -1.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.52% | 13.28% | -1.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.44% | 20.68% | -5.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.06% | 22.17% | -3.11% |
SDOG vs. XLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
SDOG has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than XLC's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
SDOG vs. XLC - Dividend Comparison
SDOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, more than XLC's 1.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDOG ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF | 3.26% | 3.68% | 3.86% | 4.29% | 3.87% | 3.62% | 3.63% | 3.37% | 4.03% | 3.27% | 3.32% | 3.61% |
XLC Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund | 1.25% | 1.13% | 0.99% | 0.82% | 1.10% | 0.74% | 0.68% | 0.82% | 0.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SDOG and XLC have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLC has higher volatility (3.57%) compared to SDOG (3.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDOG dropped -43.56% vs XLC's -46.65%.
On 5-year performance, SDOG leads with 9.08% vs 8.03% for XLC. On fees, XLC is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, SDOG has been the lower-risk option at 3.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SDOG has performed better with a 9.08% return vs 8.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLC is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for SDOG.
SDOG has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 1.25% for XLC.
SDOG is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while XLC is Communications Equities. SDOG tracks S-Network Sector Dividend Dogs Index, while XLC tracks S&P Communication Services Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for SDOG and 0.13% for XLC.
SDOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SDOG and XLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer