SDEM vs. QYLD

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF (SDEM) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD).

SDEM and QYLD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SDEM is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Top 50 Dividend. It was launched on Mar 17, 2015. QYLD is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. It was launched on Dec 12, 2013. Both SDEM and QYLD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

SDEM vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF (SDEM) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SDEM vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SDEM Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF	9.02%	32.01%	4.02%	12.64%	-21.53%	2.11%	-11.13%	17.56%	-17.40%	16.57%
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	0.02%	9.28%	19.35%	22.77%	-19.08%	10.41%	8.72%	22.69%	-3.07%	18.79%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDEM achieves a 9.02% return, which is significantly higher than QYLD's 0.02% return. Over the past 10 years, SDEM has underperformed QYLD with an annualized return of 4.68%, while QYLD has yielded a comparatively higher 8.89% annualized return.

SDEM

• 1D: 2.83%
• 1M: -3.15%
• YTD: 9.02%
• 6M: 17.87%
• 1Y: 32.71%
• 3Y*: 18.58%
• 5Y*: 5.04%
• 10Y*: 4.68%

QYLD

• 1D: 2.69%
• 1M: -1.52%
• YTD: 0.02%
• 6M: 7.09%
• 1Y: 16.31%
• 3Y*: 12.97%
• 5Y*: 6.88%
• 10Y*: 8.89%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDEM vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDEM has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.

SDEM

Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF

QYLD

Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF

Return for Risk

SDEM vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDEM

SDEM Risk / Return Rank: 93
SDEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
SDEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
SDEM Omega Ratio Rank: 93
SDEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
SDEM Martin Ratio Rank: 93

QYLD

QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 72
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 83
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDEM vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF (SDEM) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SDEM	QYLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.15	1.00	+1.15
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.80	1.61	+1.19
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.31	+0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.31	1.51	+1.79
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.51	9.98	+3.53
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SDEM vs. QYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is higher than the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDEM and QYLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SDEM	QYLD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.15	1.00	+1.15
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.29	0.47	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.24	0.58	-0.33
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.18	0.55	-0.37

Correlation

The correlation between SDEM and QYLD is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

SDEM vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

SDEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.92%, less than QYLD's 11.92% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SDEM Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF	4.92%	5.27%	7.28%	7.50%	8.86%	8.14%	6.30%	6.47%	6.55%	5.01%	5.06%	6.14%
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	11.92%	11.55%	12.50%	11.78%	13.75%	12.85%	11.16%	9.84%	12.44%	7.69%	9.15%	9.42%

Drawdowns

SDEM vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDEM drawdown since its inception was -47.38%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDEM and QYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	SDEM	QYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.38%	-24.75%	-22.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.78%	-10.84%	+1.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.72%	-24.61%	-12.11%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.38%	-24.75%	-22.63%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.01%	-2.41%	-1.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.99%	-3.89%	-17.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.39%	1.64%	+0.75%

Volatility

SDEM vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison

Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF (SDEM) has a higher volatility of 7.05% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 4.90%. This indicates that SDEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SDEM	QYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.05%	4.90%	+2.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.37%	7.48%	+2.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.29%	16.42%	-1.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.35%	14.84%	+2.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.31%	15.51%	+3.80%