SDEM vs. SDIV
SDEM (Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF) and SDIV (Global X SuperDividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SDEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Top 50 Dividend, while SDIV is a Global Equities fund tracking the Solactive Global SuperDividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SDEM returned 5.02%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for SDIV. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SDEM charges 0.67%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for SDIV.
Performance
SDEM vs. SDIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SDEM achieves a 9.57% return, which is significantly higher than SDIV's 4.72% return. Over the past 10 years, SDEM has outperformed SDIV with an annualized return of 5.02%, while SDIV has yielded a comparatively lower 0.07% annualized return.
SDEM
- 1D
- -1.22%
- 1M
- -0.72%
- YTD
- 9.57%
- 6M
- 10.76%
- 1Y
- 27.19%
- 3Y*
- 19.29%
- 5Y*
- 4.56%
- 10Y*
- 5.02%
SDIV
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -2.85%
- YTD
- 4.72%
- 6M
- 5.07%
- 1Y
- 20.36%
- 3Y*
- 14.94%
- 5Y*
- -0.74%
- 10Y*
- 0.07%
SDEM vs. SDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDEM Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF | 9.57% | 32.01% | 4.02% | 12.64% | -21.53% | 2.11% | -11.13% | 17.56% | -17.40% | 16.57% |
SDIV Global X SuperDividend ETF | 4.72% | 29.12% | 1.77% | 5.46% | -26.43% | 3.76% | -20.89% | 13.04% | -15.07% | 11.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between SDEM and SDIV is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2015 | 0.73 |
The correlation between SDEM and SDIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
SDEM vs. SDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SDEM
SDIV
Financial Services
Industrials
Real Estate
Utilities
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Energy
Healthcare
Financial Services
SDEM
SDIV
Industrials
SDEM
SDIV
Real Estate
SDEM
SDIV
Utilities
SDEM
SDIV
Communication Services
SDEM
SDIV
Consumer Defensive
SDEM
SDIV
Basic Materials
SDEM
SDIV
Consumer Cyclical
SDEM
SDIV
Technology
SDEM
SDIV
Energy
SDEM
SDIV
Healthcare
SDEM
SDIV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SDEM vs. SDIV — Risk / Return Rank
SDEM
SDIV
SDEM vs. SDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF (SDEM) and Global X SuperDividend ETF (SDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SDEM | SDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.28 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.03 | 2.78 | +0.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.75 | 8.64 | +1.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SDEM vs. SDIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDEM drawdown since its inception was -47.38%, smaller than the maximum SDIV drawdown of -56.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDEM and SDIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SDEM | SDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.38% | -56.90% | +9.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.03% | -7.35% | -1.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.34% | -18.64% | +6.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.08% | -40.32% | +4.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.38% | -56.90% | +9.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.88% | -18.75% | +13.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.63% | -18.58% | -2.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.80% | 2.36% | +0.44% |
Volatility
SDEM vs. SDIV - Volatility Comparison
Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF (SDEM) has a higher volatility of 4.49% compared to Global X SuperDividend ETF (SDIV) at 3.88%. This indicates that SDEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SDEM | SDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.49% | 3.88% | +0.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.57% | 9.90% | +1.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.95% | 12.69% | +1.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.48% | 16.86% | +0.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.14% | 18.93% | +0.21% |
SDEM vs. SDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SDEM has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than SDIV's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
SDEM vs. SDIV - Dividend Comparison
SDEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.06%, less than SDIV's 9.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDEM Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF | 5.06% | 5.27% | 7.28% | 7.50% | 8.86% | 8.14% | 6.30% | 6.47% | 6.55% | 5.01% | 5.06% | 6.14% |
SDIV Global X SuperDividend ETF | 9.34% | 9.59% | 11.33% | 11.73% | 14.17% | 8.95% | 7.96% | 8.73% | 9.22% | 6.66% | 6.95% | 7.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SDEM and SDIV have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SDEM has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to SDIV (3.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDEM dropped -47.38% vs SDIV's -56.90%.
On 10-year performance, SDEM leads with 5.02% vs 0.07% for SDIV. On fees, SDIV is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, SDIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SDEM has performed better with a 5.02% return vs 0.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SDIV is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.67% for SDEM.
SDIV has the higher dividend yield at 9.34%, compared with 5.06% for SDEM.
SDEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while SDIV is Global Equities. SDEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Top 50 Dividend, while SDIV tracks Solactive Global SuperDividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.67% for SDEM and 0.58% for SDIV.
SDEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SDEM and SDIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer