SDEM vs. SPY
SDEM (Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SDEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Top 50 Dividend, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SDEM returned 5.02%/yr vs 15.53%/yr for SPY. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SDEM charges 0.67%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
SDEM vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SDEM achieves a 9.57% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's 8.15% return. Over the past 10 years, SDEM has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 5.02%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.53% annualized return.
SDEM
- 1D
- -1.22%
- 1M
- -0.72%
- YTD
- 9.57%
- 6M
- 10.76%
- 1Y
- 27.19%
- 3Y*
- 19.29%
- 5Y*
- 4.56%
- 10Y*
- 5.02%
SPY
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- -1.36%
- YTD
- 8.15%
- 6M
- 7.20%
- 1Y
- 23.59%
- 3Y*
- 20.68%
- 5Y*
- 13.05%
- 10Y*
- 15.53%
SDEM vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDEM Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF | 9.57% | 32.01% | 4.02% | 12.64% | -21.53% | 2.11% | -11.13% | 17.56% | -17.40% | 16.57% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 8.15% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 31.22% | -4.57% | 21.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between SDEM and SPY is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2015 | 0.56 |
The correlation between SDEM and SPY shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (5 years) to 0.60 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SDEM vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SDEM
SPY
Financial Services
Industrials
Real Estate
Utilities
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Energy
Healthcare
Financial Services
SDEM
SPY
Industrials
SDEM
SPY
Real Estate
SDEM
SPY
Utilities
SDEM
SPY
Communication Services
SDEM
SPY
Consumer Defensive
SDEM
SPY
Basic Materials
SDEM
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
SDEM
SPY
Technology
SDEM
SPY
Energy
SDEM
SPY
Healthcare
SDEM
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SDEM vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
SDEM
SPY
SDEM vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF (SDEM) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SDEM | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.34 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.03 | 2.67 | +0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.75 | 11.92 | -2.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SDEM vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDEM drawdown since its inception was -47.38%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDEM and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SDEM | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.38% | -55.19% | +7.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.03% | -8.88% | -0.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.34% | -18.76% | +6.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.08% | -24.50% | -11.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.38% | -33.72% | -13.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.88% | -3.17% | -1.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.63% | -9.04% | -11.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.80% | 1.98% | +0.82% |
Volatility
SDEM vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF (SDEM) is 4.49%, while State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) has a volatility of 4.87%. This indicates that SDEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SDEM | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.49% | 4.87% | -0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.57% | 9.85% | +1.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.95% | 12.50% | +1.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.48% | 17.15% | +0.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.14% | 17.95% | +1.19% |
SDEM vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
SDEM has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
SDEM vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
SDEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.06%, more than SPY's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDEM Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF | 5.06% | 5.27% | 7.28% | 7.50% | 8.86% | 8.14% | 6.30% | 6.47% | 6.55% | 5.01% | 5.06% | 6.14% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1.03% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SDEM and SPY have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPY has higher volatility (4.87%) compared to SDEM (4.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDEM dropped -47.38% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 15.53% vs 5.02% for SDEM. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SDEM has been the lower-risk option at 4.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 15.53% return vs 5.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.67% for SDEM.
SDEM has the higher dividend yield at 5.06%, compared with 1.03% for SPY.
SDEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. SDEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Top 50 Dividend, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.67% for SDEM and 0.09% for SPY.
SDEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SDEM and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer