PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDEM vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SDEM vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF (SDEM) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDEM achieves a 9.57% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 17.72% return. Over the past 10 years, SDEM has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 5.02%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.72% annualized return.


SDEM

1D
-1.22%
1M
-0.72%
YTD
9.57%
6M
10.76%
1Y
27.19%
3Y*
19.29%
5Y*
4.56%
10Y*
5.02%

SCHD

1D
0.41%
1M
-2.47%
YTD
17.72%
6M
17.25%
1Y
24.56%
3Y*
14.60%
5Y*
8.71%
10Y*
12.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDEM vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SDEM
Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF
9.57%32.01%4.02%12.64%-21.53%2.11%-11.13%17.56%-17.40%16.57%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
17.72%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between SDEM and SCHD is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2015

0.51

The correlation between SDEM and SCHD shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SDEM vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SDEM
SCHD

Financial Services

27.3%
9.1%

Industrials

11.1%
7.4%

Real Estate

8.1%

-

Utilities

7.1%
0.0%

Communication Services

5.5%
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

5.2%
18.5%

Basic Materials

3.7%
1.2%

Consumer Cyclical

3.5%
6.7%

Technology

3.3%
19.4%

Energy

3.2%
14.6%

Healthcare

1.8%
18.4%

Financial Services

SDEM
27.3%
SCHD
9.1%

Industrials

SDEM
11.1%
SCHD
7.4%

Real Estate

SDEM
8.1%
SCHD

-

Utilities

SDEM
7.1%
SCHD
0.0%

Communication Services

SDEM
5.5%
SCHD
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

SDEM
5.2%
SCHD
18.5%

Basic Materials

SDEM
3.7%
SCHD
1.2%

Consumer Cyclical

SDEM
3.5%
SCHD
6.7%

Technology

SDEM
3.3%
SCHD
19.4%

Energy

SDEM
3.2%
SCHD
14.6%

Healthcare

SDEM
1.8%
SCHD
18.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SDEM vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDEM
SDEM Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
SDEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDEM Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SDEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDEM Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDEM vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF (SDEM) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SDEMSCHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.40

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.03

5.35

-2.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.75

12.94

-3.19

SDEM vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDEM Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDEM and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SDEM vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDEM drawdown since its inception was -47.38%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDEM and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SDEMSCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.38%

-33.37%

-14.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.03%

-4.61%

-4.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.34%

-16.13%

+3.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.08%

-16.85%

-19.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.38%

-33.37%

-14.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.88%

-2.47%

-2.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.63%

-3.31%

-17.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.80%

1.90%

+0.90%

Volatility

SDEM vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF (SDEM) has a higher volatility of 4.49% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 3.58%. This indicates that SDEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SDEMSCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.49%

3.58%

+0.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.57%

7.73%

+3.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.95%

11.07%

+2.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.48%

14.36%

+3.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.14%

16.71%

+2.43%

SDEM vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDEM has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

SDEM vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

SDEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.06%, more than SCHD's 3.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.30%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%
SDEM
Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF
5.06%5.27%7.28%7.50%8.86%8.14%6.30%6.47%6.55%5.01%5.06%6.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


SDEM and SCHD have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SDEM has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to SCHD (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDEM dropped -47.38% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.72% vs 5.02% for SDEM. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 3.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.72% return vs 5.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.67% for SDEM.

SDEM has the higher dividend yield at 5.06%, compared with 3.30% for SCHD.

SDEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. SDEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Top 50 Dividend, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.67% for SDEM and 0.06% for SCHD.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SDEM and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer