SCZ vs. SCHC
SCZ (iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF) and SCHC (Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF) are both Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities funds - SCZ tracks the MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index while SCHC tracks the FTSE Custom Developed Small Cap ex-US Liquid Net of Tax (Lux). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCZ returned 8.03%/yr vs 8.02%/yr for SCHC. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SCZ charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.11%/yr for SCHC.
Performance
SCZ vs. SCHC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SCZ having a 9.56% return and SCHC slightly lower at 9.49%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SCZ having a 8.03% annualized return and SCHC not far behind at 8.02%.
SCZ
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 2.75%
- YTD
- 9.56%
- 6M
- 12.13%
- 1Y
- 24.04%
- 3Y*
- 16.13%
- 5Y*
- 5.02%
- 10Y*
- 8.03%
SCHC
- 1D
- -1.27%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- 9.49%
- 6M
- 12.08%
- 1Y
- 27.44%
- 3Y*
- 17.96%
- 5Y*
- 6.18%
- 10Y*
- 8.02%
SCZ vs. SCHC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCZ iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF | 9.56% | 32.08% | 1.52% | 12.98% | -21.27% | 10.12% | 11.71% | 24.68% | -17.64% | 32.72% |
SCHC Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF | 9.49% | 37.59% | 1.97% | 14.36% | -21.74% | 12.02% | 10.48% | 23.10% | -18.60% | 29.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCZ and SCHC is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2010 | 0.95 |
The correlation between SCZ and SCHC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCZ vs. SCHC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCZ
SCHC
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Industrials
SCZ
SCHC
Financial Services
SCZ
SCHC
Consumer Cyclical
SCZ
SCHC
Basic Materials
SCZ
SCHC
Real Estate
SCZ
SCHC
Technology
SCZ
SCHC
Healthcare
SCZ
SCHC
Consumer Defensive
SCZ
SCHC
Communication Services
SCZ
SCHC
Energy
SCZ
SCHC
Utilities
SCZ
SCHC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCZ vs. SCHC — Risk / Return Rank
SCZ
SCHC
SCZ vs. SCHC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) and Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCZ | SCHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.67 | 1.78 | -0.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.39 | 2.47 | -0.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.32 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.11 | 2.21 | -0.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.08 | 8.41 | -0.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCZ | SCHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.67 | 1.78 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | 0.35 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.45 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.40 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
SCZ vs. SCHC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCZ drawdown since its inception was -61.86%, which is greater than SCHC's maximum drawdown of -43.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCZ and SCHC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCZ | SCHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.86% | -43.94% | -17.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.43% | -12.48% | +1.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.06% | -15.52% | +0.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.87% | -36.48% | -0.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.07% | -43.94% | +2.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.79% | -3.28% | +1.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.06% | -10.05% | -3.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.98% | 3.27% | -0.29% |
Volatility
SCZ vs. SCHC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) is 4.57%, while Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC) has a volatility of 5.05%. This indicates that SCZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCZ | SCHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.57% | 5.05% | -0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.95% | 13.05% | -1.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.47% | 15.50% | -1.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.74% | 17.50% | -0.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.43% | 17.99% | -0.56% |
SCZ vs. SCHC - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCZ has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHC's 0.11% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCZ vs. SCHC - Dividend Comparison
SCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, less than SCHC's 3.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHC Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF | 3.34% | 3.66% | 3.72% | 2.94% | 1.78% | 3.02% | 1.62% | 3.23% | 2.51% | 2.73% | 2.01% | 2.34% |
SCZ iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF | 3.01% | 3.30% | 3.50% | 2.96% | 1.99% | 2.96% | 1.52% | 3.52% | 2.79% | 2.38% | 2.82% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, SCZ and SCHC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCHC has higher volatility (5.05%) compared to SCZ (4.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCZ dropped -61.86% vs SCHC's -43.94%.
On 10-year performance, SCZ leads with 8.03% vs 8.02% for SCHC. On fees, SCHC is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, SCZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCZ has performed better with a 8.03% return vs 8.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHC is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for SCZ.
SCHC has the higher dividend yield at 3.34%, compared with 3.01% for SCZ.
SCZ tracks MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index, while SCHC tracks FTSE Custom Developed Small Cap ex-US Liquid Net of Tax (Lux). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for SCZ and 0.11% for SCHC.
SCHC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCZ and SCHC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer