SCZ vs. IWM
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM).
SCZ and IWM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SCZ is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index. It was launched on Dec 10, 2007. IWM is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Index. It was launched on May 22, 2000. Both SCZ and IWM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
SCZ vs. IWM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SCZ vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCZ iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF | 1.14% | 32.08% | 1.52% | 12.98% | -21.27% | 10.12% | 11.71% | 24.68% | -17.64% | 32.72% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 0.93% | 12.66% | 11.38% | 16.83% | -20.48% | 14.54% | 20.03% | 25.39% | -11.12% | 14.58% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCZ achieves a 1.14% return, which is significantly higher than IWM's 0.93% return. Over the past 10 years, SCZ has underperformed IWM with an annualized return of 7.69%, while IWM has yielded a comparatively higher 9.76% annualized return.
SCZ
- 1D
- 3.06%
- 1M
- -8.53%
- YTD
- 1.14%
- 6M
- 4.20%
- 1Y
- 27.73%
- 3Y*
- 13.29%
- 5Y*
- 4.46%
- 10Y*
- 7.69%
IWM
- 1D
- 3.50%
- 1M
- -4.96%
- YTD
- 0.93%
- 6M
- 3.02%
- 1Y
- 25.66%
- 3Y*
- 12.94%
- 5Y*
- 3.34%
- 10Y*
- 9.76%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SCZ vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCZ has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SCZ vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank
SCZ
IWM
SCZ vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCZ | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.71 | 1.11 | +0.59 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.31 | 1.66 | +0.65 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.21 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.29 | 1.82 | +0.47 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.00 | 6.76 | +2.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCZ | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.71 | 1.11 | +0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.15 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.43 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.34 | -0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between SCZ and IWM is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SCZ vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison
SCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, more than IWM's 1.02% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCZ iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF | 3.26% | 3.30% | 3.50% | 2.96% | 1.99% | 2.96% | 1.52% | 3.52% | 2.79% | 2.38% | 2.82% | 2.06% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 1.02% | 1.04% | 1.15% | 1.35% | 1.48% | 0.94% | 1.04% | 1.26% | 1.40% | 1.26% | 1.38% | 1.54% |
Drawdowns
SCZ vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCZ drawdown since its inception was -61.86%, roughly equal to the maximum IWM drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCZ and IWM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCZ | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.86% | -59.05% | -2.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.43% | -13.74% | +2.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.87% | -31.91% | -4.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.07% | -41.13% | +0.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.53% | -7.91% | -0.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.17% | -10.83% | -2.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.91% | 3.70% | -0.79% |
Volatility
SCZ vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) have volatilities of 7.37% and 7.47%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SCZ | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.37% | 7.47% | -0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.71% | 14.47% | -3.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.38% | 23.18% | -6.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.62% | 22.55% | -5.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.35% | 22.99% | -5.64% |