PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHC vs. FNDC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHC vs. FNDC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC) and Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHC achieves a 8.19% return, which is significantly lower than FNDC's 11.11% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHC has underperformed FNDC with an annualized return of 8.68%, while FNDC has yielded a comparatively higher 9.32% annualized return.


SCHC

1D
-0.20%
1M
-1.97%
YTD
8.19%
6M
8.34%
1Y
24.95%
3Y*
18.14%
5Y*
6.51%
10Y*
8.68%

FNDC

1D
-0.54%
1M
-0.66%
YTD
11.11%
6M
11.31%
1Y
26.81%
3Y*
18.70%
5Y*
7.78%
10Y*
9.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHC vs. FNDC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHC
Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF
8.19%37.59%1.97%14.36%-21.74%12.02%10.48%23.10%-18.60%29.42%
FNDC
Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF
11.11%35.65%1.38%14.92%-14.71%10.26%6.58%20.58%-19.10%29.22%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHC and FNDC is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2013

0.95

The correlation between SCHC and FNDC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCHC vs. FNDC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHC
FNDC

Industrials

16.1%
25.3%

Financial Services

13.1%
11.4%

Basic Materials

11.7%
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

7.4%
12.9%

Technology

6.7%
10.1%

Real Estate

5.0%
6.6%

Energy

4.4%
4.1%

Healthcare

3.7%
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.1%
6.1%

Utilities

2.2%
2.6%

Communication Services

2.2%
4.7%

Industrials

SCHC
16.1%
FNDC
25.3%

Financial Services

SCHC
13.1%
FNDC
11.4%

Basic Materials

SCHC
11.7%
FNDC
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHC
7.4%
FNDC
12.9%

Technology

SCHC
6.7%
FNDC
10.1%

Real Estate

SCHC
5.0%
FNDC
6.6%

Energy

SCHC
4.4%
FNDC
4.1%

Healthcare

SCHC
3.7%
FNDC
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

SCHC
3.1%
FNDC
6.1%

Utilities

SCHC
2.2%
FNDC
2.6%

Communication Services

SCHC
2.2%
FNDC
4.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHC vs. FNDC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHC
SCHC Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
SCHC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHC Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHC Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

FNDC
FNDC Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
FNDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDC Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDC Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHC vs. FNDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC) and Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCHCFNDCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.33

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

2.40

-0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.33

8.83

-1.51

SCHC vs. FNDC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHC Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the FNDC Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHC and FNDC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCHC vs. FNDC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHC drawdown since its inception was -43.94%, roughly equal to the maximum FNDC drawdown of -43.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHC and FNDC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHCFNDCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.94%

-43.22%

-0.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.48%

-11.20%

-1.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.52%

-12.98%

-2.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.48%

-32.13%

-4.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.94%

-43.22%

-0.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.42%

-2.31%

-2.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.04%

-8.42%

-1.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.41%

3.04%

+0.37%

Volatility

SCHC vs. FNDC - Volatility Comparison

Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC) has a higher volatility of 5.84% compared to Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC) at 5.11%. This indicates that SCHC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHCFNDCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.84%

5.11%

+0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.93%

12.53%

+1.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.20%

14.81%

+1.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.61%

16.06%

+1.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.00%

16.81%

+1.19%

SCHC vs. FNDC - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHC has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDC's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCHC vs. FNDC - Dividend Comparison

SCHC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, less than FNDC's 3.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNDC
Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF
3.47%3.86%3.59%2.86%1.98%2.58%1.77%2.71%2.68%1.94%1.95%1.30%
SCHC
Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF
3.38%3.66%3.72%2.94%1.78%3.02%1.62%3.23%2.51%2.73%2.01%2.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, SCHC and FNDC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SCHC has higher volatility (5.84%) compared to FNDC (5.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHC dropped -43.94% vs FNDC's -43.22%.

On 10-year performance, FNDC leads with 9.32% vs 8.68% for SCHC. On fees, SCHC is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FNDC has been the lower-risk option at 5.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FNDC has performed better with a 9.32% return vs 8.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHC is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for FNDC.

FNDC has the higher dividend yield at 3.47%, compared with 3.38% for SCHC.

SCHC tracks FTSE Developed Small Cap ex U.S. Liquid Index, while FNDC tracks Russell RAFI Small Company Developed x US. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for SCHC and 0.39% for FNDC.

FNDC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHC and FNDC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer