PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHC vs. VSS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHC vs. VSS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC) and Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHC achieves a 8.19% return, which is significantly lower than VSS's 10.76% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SCHC having a 8.68% annualized return and VSS not far ahead at 8.76%.


SCHC

1D
-0.20%
1M
-1.97%
YTD
8.19%
6M
8.34%
1Y
24.95%
3Y*
18.14%
5Y*
6.51%
10Y*
8.68%

VSS

1D
0.22%
1M
-0.37%
YTD
10.76%
6M
11.06%
1Y
26.93%
3Y*
17.08%
5Y*
6.23%
10Y*
8.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHC vs. VSS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHC
Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF
8.19%37.59%1.97%14.36%-21.74%12.02%10.48%23.10%-18.60%29.42%
VSS
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF
10.76%29.61%2.94%15.52%-21.48%13.05%11.81%21.36%-18.48%30.61%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHC and VSS is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2010

0.96

The correlation between SCHC and VSS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCHC vs. VSS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHC
VSS

Industrials

16.1%
18.7%

Financial Services

13.1%
10.1%

Basic Materials

11.7%
12.2%

Consumer Cyclical

7.4%
9.1%

Technology

6.7%
14.5%

Real Estate

5.0%
7.1%

Energy

4.4%
4.4%

Healthcare

3.7%
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.1%
3.5%

Utilities

2.2%
2.5%

Communication Services

2.2%
2.3%

Industrials

SCHC
16.1%
VSS
18.7%

Financial Services

SCHC
13.1%
VSS
10.1%

Basic Materials

SCHC
11.7%
VSS
12.2%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHC
7.4%
VSS
9.1%

Technology

SCHC
6.7%
VSS
14.5%

Real Estate

SCHC
5.0%
VSS
7.1%

Energy

SCHC
4.4%
VSS
4.4%

Healthcare

SCHC
3.7%
VSS
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

SCHC
3.1%
VSS
3.5%

Utilities

SCHC
2.2%
VSS
2.5%

Communication Services

SCHC
2.2%
VSS
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHC vs. VSS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHC
SCHC Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
SCHC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHC Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHC Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

VSS
VSS Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
VSS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSS Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
VSS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSS Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHC vs. VSS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC) and Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCHCVSSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.32

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

2.33

-0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.33

8.70

-1.37

SCHC vs. VSS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHC Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the VSS Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHC and VSS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCHC vs. VSS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHC drawdown since its inception was -43.94%, roughly equal to the maximum VSS drawdown of -43.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHC and VSS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHCVSSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.94%

-43.51%

-0.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.48%

-11.62%

-0.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.52%

-15.73%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.48%

-33.93%

-2.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.94%

-43.51%

-0.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.42%

-2.41%

-2.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.04%

-9.62%

-0.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.41%

3.10%

+0.31%

Volatility

SCHC vs. VSS - Volatility Comparison

Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC) and Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS) have volatilities of 5.84% and 5.97%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHCVSSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.84%

5.97%

-0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.93%

13.61%

+0.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.20%

15.59%

+0.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.61%

16.59%

+1.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.00%

17.28%

+0.72%

SCHC vs. VSS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHC has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than VSS's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHC vs. VSS - Dividend Comparison

SCHC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, more than VSS's 3.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHC
Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF
3.38%3.66%3.72%2.94%1.78%3.02%1.62%3.23%2.51%2.73%2.01%2.34%
VSS
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF
3.15%3.39%3.44%3.14%2.30%2.74%1.90%3.25%2.80%2.83%2.93%2.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, SCHC and VSS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VSS has higher volatility (5.97%) compared to SCHC (5.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHC dropped -43.94% vs VSS's -43.51%.

On 10-year performance, VSS leads with 8.76% vs 8.68% for SCHC. On fees, VSS is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, SCHC has been the lower-risk option at 5.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VSS has performed better with a 8.76% return vs 8.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VSS is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for SCHC.

SCHC has the higher dividend yield at 3.38%, compared with 3.15% for VSS.

SCHC tracks FTSE Developed Small Cap ex U.S. Liquid Index, while VSS tracks FTSE Global Small Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for SCHC and 0.07% for VSS.

VSS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHC and VSS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer