SCZ vs. ISCF
SCZ (iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF) and ISCF (iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF) are both Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities funds from iShares - SCZ tracks the MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index while ISCF tracks the MSCI World exUSA SmallCap Diversified Multi-Factor. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCZ returned 8.92%/yr vs 9.24%/yr for ISCF. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.40% expense ratio.
Performance
SCZ vs. ISCF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCZ achieves a 9.50% return, which is significantly higher than ISCF's 7.82% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SCZ having a 8.92% annualized return and ISCF not far ahead at 9.24%.
SCZ
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -0.31%
- YTD
- 9.50%
- 6M
- 9.97%
- 1Y
- 24.34%
- 3Y*
- 16.72%
- 5Y*
- 5.65%
- 10Y*
- 8.92%
ISCF
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -0.01%
- YTD
- 7.82%
- 6M
- 8.05%
- 1Y
- 22.38%
- 3Y*
- 18.06%
- 5Y*
- 7.94%
- 10Y*
- 9.24%
SCZ vs. ISCF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCZ iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF | 9.50% | 32.08% | 1.52% | 12.98% | -21.27% | 10.12% | 11.71% | 24.68% | -17.64% | 32.72% |
ISCF iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF | 7.82% | 33.65% | 4.75% | 11.50% | -15.07% | 13.31% | 7.65% | 26.32% | -18.76% | 38.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCZ and ISCF is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2015 | 0.88 |
The correlation between SCZ and ISCF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCZ vs. ISCF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCZ
ISCF
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Industrials
SCZ
ISCF
Financial Services
SCZ
ISCF
Consumer Cyclical
SCZ
ISCF
Technology
SCZ
ISCF
Basic Materials
SCZ
ISCF
Real Estate
SCZ
ISCF
Healthcare
SCZ
ISCF
Consumer Defensive
SCZ
ISCF
Communication Services
SCZ
ISCF
Energy
SCZ
ISCF
Utilities
SCZ
ISCF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCZ vs. ISCF — Risk / Return Rank
SCZ
ISCF
SCZ vs. ISCF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) and iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF (ISCF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCZ | ISCF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.28 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.14 | 1.98 | +0.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.07 | 7.27 | +0.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCZ vs. ISCF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCZ drawdown since its inception was -61.86%, which is greater than ISCF's maximum drawdown of -40.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCZ and ISCF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCZ | ISCF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.86% | -40.79% | -21.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.43% | -11.34% | -0.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.06% | -13.85% | -1.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.87% | -30.70% | -6.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.07% | -40.79% | -0.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.84% | -2.15% | +0.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.03% | -8.12% | -4.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 3.09% | -0.07% |
Volatility
SCZ vs. ISCF - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) and iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF (ISCF) have volatilities of 4.73% and 4.61%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCZ | ISCF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.73% | 4.61% | +0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.53% | 12.43% | +0.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.89% | 14.80% | +0.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.79% | 16.72% | +0.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.40% | 17.42% | -0.02% |
SCZ vs. ISCF - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SCZ and ISCF have an expense ratio of 0.40%.
Dividends
SCZ vs. ISCF - Dividend Comparison
SCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, less than ISCF's 3.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISCF iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF | 3.67% | 3.76% | 4.29% | 3.94% | 2.73% | 3.93% | 2.30% | 2.87% | 2.14% | 1.97% | 2.89% | 1.46% |
SCZ iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF | 3.19% | 3.30% | 3.50% | 2.96% | 1.99% | 2.96% | 1.52% | 3.52% | 2.79% | 2.38% | 2.82% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, SCZ and ISCF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCZ has higher volatility (4.73%) compared to ISCF (4.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCZ dropped -61.86% vs ISCF's -40.79%.
On 10-year performance, ISCF leads with 9.24% vs 8.92% for SCZ. Both ETFs have the same 0.40% expense ratio. On volatility, ISCF has been the lower-risk option at 4.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ISCF has performed better with a 9.24% return vs 8.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCZ and ISCF have the same expense ratio: 0.40% per year.
ISCF has the higher dividend yield at 3.67%, compared with 3.19% for SCZ.
SCZ tracks MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index, while ISCF tracks MSCI World exUSA SmallCap Diversified Multi-Factor.
SCZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCZ and ISCF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer