PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCZ vs. ISCF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCZ vs. ISCF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) and iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF (ISCF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCZ achieves a 9.50% return, which is significantly higher than ISCF's 7.82% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SCZ having a 8.92% annualized return and ISCF not far ahead at 9.24%.


SCZ

1D
0.16%
1M
-0.31%
YTD
9.50%
6M
9.97%
1Y
24.34%
3Y*
16.72%
5Y*
5.65%
10Y*
8.92%

ISCF

1D
0.27%
1M
-0.01%
YTD
7.82%
6M
8.05%
1Y
22.38%
3Y*
18.06%
5Y*
7.94%
10Y*
9.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCZ vs. ISCF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCZ
iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF
9.50%32.08%1.52%12.98%-21.27%10.12%11.71%24.68%-17.64%32.72%
ISCF
iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF
7.82%33.65%4.75%11.50%-15.07%13.31%7.65%26.32%-18.76%38.13%

Correlation

The correlation between SCZ and ISCF is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2015

0.88

The correlation between SCZ and ISCF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCZ vs. ISCF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCZ
ISCF

Industrials

24.2%
23.8%

Financial Services

12.5%
12.1%

Consumer Cyclical

12.3%
12.4%

Technology

10.8%
10.8%

Basic Materials

10.2%
11.6%

Real Estate

9.9%
8.5%

Healthcare

5.9%
5.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
3.9%

Communication Services

3.8%
3.7%

Energy

3.5%
4.6%

Utilities

2.2%
3.5%

Industrials

SCZ
24.2%
ISCF
23.8%

Financial Services

SCZ
12.5%
ISCF
12.1%

Consumer Cyclical

SCZ
12.3%
ISCF
12.4%

Technology

SCZ
10.8%
ISCF
10.8%

Basic Materials

SCZ
10.2%
ISCF
11.6%

Real Estate

SCZ
9.9%
ISCF
8.5%

Healthcare

SCZ
5.9%
ISCF
5.3%

Consumer Defensive

SCZ
4.7%
ISCF
3.9%

Communication Services

SCZ
3.8%
ISCF
3.7%

Energy

SCZ
3.5%
ISCF
4.6%

Utilities

SCZ
2.2%
ISCF
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCZ vs. ISCF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCZ
SCZ Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
SCZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
SCZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

ISCF
ISCF Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
ISCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISCF Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
ISCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISCF Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCZ vs. ISCF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) and iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF (ISCF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCZISCFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.28

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

1.98

+0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.07

7.27

+0.80

SCZ vs. ISCF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the ISCF Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCZ and ISCF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCZ vs. ISCF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCZ drawdown since its inception was -61.86%, which is greater than ISCF's maximum drawdown of -40.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCZ and ISCF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCZISCFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.86%

-40.79%

-21.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.43%

-11.34%

-0.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.06%

-13.85%

-1.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.87%

-30.70%

-6.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.07%

-40.79%

-0.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.84%

-2.15%

+0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.03%

-8.12%

-4.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

3.09%

-0.07%

Volatility

SCZ vs. ISCF - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) and iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF (ISCF) have volatilities of 4.73% and 4.61%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCZISCFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.73%

4.61%

+0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.53%

12.43%

+0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.89%

14.80%

+0.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.79%

16.72%

+0.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.40%

17.42%

-0.02%

SCZ vs. ISCF - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SCZ and ISCF have an expense ratio of 0.40%.


Dividends

SCZ vs. ISCF - Dividend Comparison

SCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, less than ISCF's 3.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ISCF
iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF
3.67%3.76%4.29%3.94%2.73%3.93%2.30%2.87%2.14%1.97%2.89%1.46%
SCZ
iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF
3.19%3.30%3.50%2.96%1.99%2.96%1.52%3.52%2.79%2.38%2.82%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, SCZ and ISCF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SCZ has higher volatility (4.73%) compared to ISCF (4.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCZ dropped -61.86% vs ISCF's -40.79%.

On 10-year performance, ISCF leads with 9.24% vs 8.92% for SCZ. Both ETFs have the same 0.40% expense ratio. On volatility, ISCF has been the lower-risk option at 4.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ISCF has performed better with a 9.24% return vs 8.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCZ and ISCF have the same expense ratio: 0.40% per year.

ISCF has the higher dividend yield at 3.67%, compared with 3.19% for SCZ.

SCZ tracks MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index, while ISCF tracks MSCI World exUSA SmallCap Diversified Multi-Factor.

SCZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCZ and ISCF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer