SCZ vs. VPL
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) and Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL).
SCZ and VPL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SCZ is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index. It was launched on Dec 10, 2007. VPL is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the FTSE Developed Asia Pacific Index. It was launched on Mar 4, 2005. Both SCZ and VPL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SCZ or VPL.
Correlation
The correlation between SCZ and VPL is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
SCZ vs. VPL - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
SCZ:
0.19
VPL:
0.23
SCZ:
0.36
VPL:
0.41
SCZ:
1.04
VPL:
1.05
SCZ:
0.13
VPL:
0.30
SCZ:
0.70
VPL:
0.88
SCZ:
3.77%
VPL:
3.88%
SCZ:
13.69%
VPL:
15.11%
SCZ:
-61.86%
VPL:
-55.49%
SCZ:
-15.05%
VPL:
-9.12%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCZ achieves a 1.28% return, which is significantly lower than VPL's 1.71% return. Over the past 10 years, SCZ has outperformed VPL with an annualized return of 5.27%, while VPL has yielded a comparatively lower 4.97% annualized return.
SCZ
1.28%
-1.23%
-0.39%
2.19%
2.27%
5.27%
VPL
1.71%
-2.41%
-0.71%
3.13%
3.33%
4.97%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SCZ vs. VPL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCZ has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VPL's 0.08% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SCZ vs. VPL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) and Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SCZ vs. VPL - Dividend Comparison
SCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, more than VPL's 3.15% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCZ iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF | 3.51% | 2.95% | 1.99% | 2.96% | 1.52% | 3.51% | 2.79% | 2.38% | 2.82% | 2.06% | 2.61% | 2.40% |
VPL Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF | 3.15% | 3.12% | 2.75% | 3.19% | 1.81% | 2.85% | 3.06% | 2.57% | 2.65% | 2.43% | 2.69% | 2.49% |
Drawdowns
SCZ vs. VPL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCZ drawdown since its inception was -61.86%, which is greater than VPL's maximum drawdown of -55.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCZ and VPL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SCZ vs. VPL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) is 3.68%, while Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL) has a volatility of 4.02%. This indicates that SCZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.