SCZ vs. VPL
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) and Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL).
SCZ and VPL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SCZ is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index. It was launched on Dec 10, 2007. VPL is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the FTSE Developed Asia Pacific Index. It was launched on Mar 4, 2005. Both SCZ and VPL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
SCZ vs. VPL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SCZ vs. VPL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCZ iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF | 1.14% | 32.08% | 1.52% | 12.98% | -21.27% | 10.12% | 11.71% | 24.68% | -17.64% | 32.72% |
VPL Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF | 8.11% | 32.66% | 1.68% | 15.58% | -15.20% | 1.10% | 16.65% | 18.16% | -14.40% | 28.85% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCZ achieves a 1.14% return, which is significantly lower than VPL's 8.11% return. Over the past 10 years, SCZ has underperformed VPL with an annualized return of 7.69%, while VPL has yielded a comparatively higher 9.19% annualized return.
SCZ
- 1D
- 3.06%
- 1M
- -8.53%
- YTD
- 1.14%
- 6M
- 4.20%
- 1Y
- 27.73%
- 3Y*
- 13.29%
- 5Y*
- 4.46%
- 10Y*
- 7.69%
VPL
- 1D
- 3.52%
- 1M
- -10.28%
- YTD
- 8.11%
- 6M
- 14.30%
- 1Y
- 39.82%
- 3Y*
- 16.85%
- 5Y*
- 6.86%
- 10Y*
- 9.19%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SCZ vs. VPL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCZ has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VPL's 0.08% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SCZ vs. VPL — Risk / Return Rank
SCZ
VPL
SCZ vs. VPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) and Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCZ | VPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.71 | 1.95 | -0.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.31 | 2.58 | -0.28 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.38 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.29 | 2.91 | -0.62 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.00 | 11.94 | -2.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCZ | VPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.71 | 1.95 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.41 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.54 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.30 | -0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between SCZ and VPL is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SCZ vs. VPL - Dividend Comparison
SCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, which matches VPL's 3.28% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCZ iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF | 3.26% | 3.30% | 3.50% | 2.96% | 1.99% | 2.96% | 1.52% | 3.52% | 2.79% | 2.38% | 2.82% | 2.06% |
VPL Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF | 3.28% | 4.01% | 3.15% | 3.12% | 2.75% | 3.19% | 1.81% | 2.84% | 3.06% | 2.57% | 2.65% | 2.43% |
Drawdowns
SCZ vs. VPL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCZ drawdown since its inception was -61.86%, which is greater than VPL's maximum drawdown of -55.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCZ and VPL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCZ | VPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.86% | -55.49% | -6.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.43% | -13.33% | +1.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.87% | -31.09% | -5.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.07% | -33.90% | -7.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.53% | -10.28% | +1.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.17% | -11.71% | -1.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.91% | 3.25% | -0.34% |
Volatility
SCZ vs. VPL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) is 7.37%, while Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL) has a volatility of 10.59%. This indicates that SCZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SCZ | VPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.37% | 10.59% | -3.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.71% | 14.73% | -4.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.38% | 20.49% | -4.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.62% | 16.81% | -0.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.35% | 17.10% | +0.25% |