SCHC vs. VB
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB).
SCHC and VB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SCHC is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the FTSE Custom Developed Small Cap ex-US Liquid Net of Tax (Lux). It was launched on Jan 14, 2010. VB is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the CRSP US Small Cap. It was launched on Jan 26, 2004. Both SCHC and VB are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SCHC or VB.
Correlation
The correlation between SCHC and VB is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
SCHC vs. VB - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
SCHC:
0.29
VB:
1.01
SCHC:
0.48
VB:
1.46
SCHC:
1.06
VB:
1.18
SCHC:
0.21
VB:
1.49
SCHC:
1.15
VB:
5.27
SCHC:
3.53%
VB:
3.26%
SCHC:
13.99%
VB:
17.09%
SCHC:
-43.94%
VB:
-59.58%
SCHC:
-13.73%
VB:
-7.20%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHC achieves a 1.26% return, which is significantly lower than VB's 14.92% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHC has underperformed VB with an annualized return of 4.41%, while VB has yielded a comparatively higher 9.15% annualized return.
SCHC
1.26%
-1.81%
-0.51%
2.49%
2.68%
4.41%
VB
14.92%
-4.35%
12.01%
14.66%
9.44%
9.15%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SCHC vs. VB - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHC has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is higher than VB's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SCHC vs. VB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SCHC vs. VB - Dividend Comparison
SCHC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, more than VB's 0.92% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF | 3.75% | 2.94% | 1.78% | 3.02% | 1.62% | 3.23% | 2.51% | 2.72% | 2.01% | 2.34% | 2.59% | 2.80% |
Vanguard Small-Cap ETF | 0.92% | 1.55% | 1.59% | 1.24% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.67% | 1.35% | 1.50% | 1.48% | 1.43% | 1.31% |
Drawdowns
SCHC vs. VB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHC drawdown since its inception was -43.94%, smaller than the maximum VB drawdown of -59.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHC and VB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SCHC vs. VB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC) is 3.68%, while Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) has a volatility of 5.71%. This indicates that SCHC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.