SCZ vs. DBEF
SCZ (iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF) and DBEF (Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCZ is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index, while DBEF is a Hedge Fund fund tracking the MSCI EAFE US Dollar Hedged Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCZ returned 8.64%/yr vs 12.79%/yr for DBEF. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCZ charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for DBEF.
Performance
SCZ vs. DBEF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCZ achieves a 9.70% return, which is significantly lower than DBEF's 11.60% return. Over the past 10 years, SCZ has underperformed DBEF with an annualized return of 8.64%, while DBEF has yielded a comparatively higher 12.79% annualized return.
SCZ
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 1.01%
- YTD
- 9.70%
- 6M
- 11.43%
- 1Y
- 23.50%
- 3Y*
- 15.38%
- 5Y*
- 4.99%
- 10Y*
- 8.64%
DBEF
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 4.03%
- YTD
- 11.60%
- 6M
- 13.17%
- 1Y
- 26.82%
- 3Y*
- 17.82%
- 5Y*
- 13.20%
- 10Y*
- 12.79%
SCZ vs. DBEF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCZ iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF | 9.70% | 32.08% | 1.52% | 12.98% | -21.27% | 10.12% | 11.71% | 24.68% | -17.64% | 32.72% |
DBEF Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 11.60% | 23.16% | 13.40% | 20.15% | -5.13% | 19.60% | 2.03% | 24.94% | -9.52% | 16.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCZ and DBEF is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2011 | 0.77 |
The correlation between SCZ and DBEF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCZ vs. DBEF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCZ
DBEF
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Industrials
SCZ
DBEF
Financial Services
SCZ
DBEF
Consumer Cyclical
SCZ
DBEF
Technology
SCZ
DBEF
Basic Materials
SCZ
DBEF
Real Estate
SCZ
DBEF
Healthcare
SCZ
DBEF
Consumer Defensive
SCZ
DBEF
Communication Services
SCZ
DBEF
Energy
SCZ
DBEF
Utilities
SCZ
DBEF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCZ vs. DBEF — Risk / Return Rank
SCZ
DBEF
SCZ vs. DBEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) and Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCZ | DBEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.37 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.95 | 2.72 | -0.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.36 | 11.46 | -4.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCZ vs. DBEF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCZ drawdown since its inception was -61.86%, which is greater than DBEF's maximum drawdown of -32.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCZ and DBEF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCZ | DBEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.86% | -32.46% | -29.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.43% | -9.41% | -2.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.06% | -14.62% | -0.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.87% | -14.95% | -21.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.07% | -32.46% | -8.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.66% | 0.00% | -1.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.05% | -4.73% | -8.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 2.23% | +0.79% |
Volatility
SCZ vs. DBEF - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) has a higher volatility of 5.27% compared to Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) at 4.58%. This indicates that SCZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCZ | DBEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.27% | 4.58% | +0.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.52% | 10.80% | +1.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.93% | 12.89% | +2.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.81% | 13.84% | +2.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.43% | 15.80% | +1.63% |
SCZ vs. DBEF - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCZ has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than DBEF's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCZ vs. DBEF - Dividend Comparison
SCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, less than DBEF's 4.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBEF Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 4.97% | 5.55% | 1.29% | 4.46% | 15.85% | 2.28% | 2.41% | 3.03% | 3.22% | 2.98% | 2.55% | 3.70% |
SCZ iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF | 3.01% | 3.30% | 3.50% | 2.96% | 1.99% | 2.96% | 1.52% | 3.52% | 2.79% | 2.38% | 2.82% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCZ and DBEF have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCZ has higher volatility (5.27%) compared to DBEF (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCZ dropped -61.86% vs DBEF's -32.46%.
On 10-year performance, DBEF leads with 12.79% vs 8.64% for SCZ. On fees, DBEF is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, DBEF has been the lower-risk option at 4.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DBEF has performed better with a 12.79% return vs 8.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DBEF is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for SCZ.
DBEF has the higher dividend yield at 4.97%, compared with 3.01% for SCZ.
SCZ is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while DBEF is Hedge Fund. SCZ tracks MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index, while DBEF tracks MSCI EAFE US Dollar Hedged Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for SCZ and 0.36% for DBEF.
DBEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCZ and DBEF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer