SCO vs. GLL
SCO (ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil) and GLL (ProShares UltraShort Gold) are both exchange-traded funds - SCO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index (-200%), while GLL is a Leveraged Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Gold (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCO returned -37.09%/yr vs -21.09%/yr for GLL. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
SCO vs. GLL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCO achieves a -57.74% return, which is significantly lower than GLL's -1.30% return. Over the past 10 years, SCO has underperformed GLL with an annualized return of -37.09%, while GLL has yielded a comparatively higher -21.09% annualized return.
SCO
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 18.27%
- 6M
- -55.73%
- YTD
- -57.74%
- 1Y
- -49.59%
- 3Y*
- -29.10%
- 5Y*
- -37.73%
- 10Y*
- -37.09%
GLL
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 4.41%
- 6M
- 7.90%
- YTD
- -1.30%
- 1Y
- -40.25%
- 3Y*
- -39.17%
- 5Y*
- -27.95%
- 10Y*
- -21.09%
SCO vs. GLL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCO ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil | -57.74% | 15.90% | -19.00% | -12.41% | -62.59% | -72.62% | -4.20% | -58.50% | 19.22% | -22.40% |
GLL ProShares UltraShort Gold | -1.30% | -62.81% | -33.33% | -14.91% | -2.12% | 1.66% | -41.47% | -26.95% | 5.39% | -23.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCO and GLL is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2008 | 0.15 |
The correlation between SCO and GLL shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCO vs. GLL — Risk / Return Rank
SCO
GLL
SCO vs. GLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil (SCO) and ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCO | GLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 0.88 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.72 | -0.64 | -0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.32 | -0.94 | -0.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCO vs. GLL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCO drawdown since its inception was -99.80%, roughly equal to the maximum GLL drawdown of -99.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCO and GLL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCO | GLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.80% | -99.24% | -0.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.24% | -65.10% | -7.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -75.14% | -87.95% | +12.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -94.80% | -89.76% | -5.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.51% | -95.76% | -3.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.72% | -98.77% | -0.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -85.24% | -85.19% | -0.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 39.10% | 44.07% | -4.97% |
Volatility
SCO vs. GLL - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil (SCO) has a higher volatility of 17.87% compared to ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL) at 16.30%. This indicates that SCO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCO | GLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.87% | 16.30% | +1.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 48.31% | 46.20% | +2.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.84% | 54.76% | +2.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.20% | 36.60% | +23.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.80% | 32.39% | +39.41% |
SCO vs. GLL - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SCO and GLL have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
SCO vs. GLL - Dividend Comparison
Neither SCO nor GLL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SCO and GLL have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCO has higher volatility (17.87%) compared to GLL (16.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCO dropped -99.80% vs GLL's -99.24%.
On 10-year performance, GLL leads with -21.09% vs -37.09% for SCO. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, GLL has been the lower-risk option at 16.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GLL has performed better with a -21.09% return vs -37.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCO and GLL have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
SCO and GLL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
SCO is categorized as Oil & Gas, while GLL is Leveraged Commodities. SCO tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index (-200%), while GLL tracks Bloomberg Gold (-200%).
GLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.76 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCO and GLL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer