SCO vs. GLL
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil (SCO) and ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL).
SCO and GLL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SCO is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index (-200%). It was launched on Nov 24, 2008. GLL is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Gold (-200%). It was launched on Dec 1, 2008. Both SCO and GLL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
SCO vs. GLL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SCO vs. GLL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCO ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil | -55.18% | 15.90% | -19.00% | -12.41% | -62.59% | -72.62% | -4.20% | -58.50% | 19.22% | -22.40% |
GLL ProShares UltraShort Gold | -25.47% | -62.81% | -33.33% | -14.91% | -2.12% | 1.66% | -41.47% | -26.95% | 5.39% | -23.67% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCO achieves a -55.18% return, which is significantly lower than GLL's -25.47% return. Over the past 10 years, SCO has underperformed GLL with an annualized return of -39.82%, while GLL has yielded a comparatively higher -24.76% annualized return.
SCO
- 1D
- 5.65%
- 1M
- -31.91%
- YTD
- -55.18%
- 6M
- -50.11%
- 1Y
- -47.55%
- 3Y*
- -29.63%
- 5Y*
- -41.92%
- 10Y*
- -39.82%
GLL
- 1D
- -3.42%
- 1M
- 21.74%
- YTD
- -25.47%
- 6M
- -41.15%
- 1Y
- -61.72%
- 3Y*
- -43.38%
- 5Y*
- -33.32%
- 10Y*
- -24.76%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SCO vs. GLL - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SCO and GLL have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Return for Risk
SCO vs. GLL — Risk / Return Rank
SCO
GLL
SCO vs. GLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil (SCO) and ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCO | GLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.84 | -1.13 | +0.29 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.20 | -2.13 | +0.93 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 0.77 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.72 | -0.86 | +0.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.71 | -1.39 | -0.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCO | GLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.84 | -1.13 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.71 | -0.94 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.55 | -0.78 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.36 | -0.70 | +0.34 |
Correlation
The correlation between SCO and GLL is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
SCO vs. GLL - Dividend Comparison
Neither SCO nor GLL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
SCO vs. GLL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCO drawdown since its inception was -99.74%, roughly equal to the maximum GLL drawdown of -99.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCO and GLL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCO | GLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.74% | -99.24% | -0.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -66.46% | -71.53% | +5.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -94.53% | -89.76% | -4.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.48% | -95.76% | -3.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.70% | -99.07% | -0.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -85.03% | -84.99% | -0.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.84% | 44.20% | -16.36% |
Volatility
SCO vs. GLL - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil (SCO) has a higher volatility of 24.45% compared to ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL) at 20.37%. This indicates that SCO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SCO | GLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.45% | 20.37% | +4.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.35% | 46.49% | -6.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.03% | 54.80% | +2.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.08% | 35.41% | +23.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.93% | 31.99% | +39.94% |