SCO vs. BOIL
SCO (ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil) and BOIL (ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas) are both Oil & Gas funds from ProShares - SCO tracks the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index (-200%) while BOIL tracks the Bloomberg Natural Gas Subindex. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCO returned -40.39%/yr vs -58.99%/yr for BOIL. Their -0.12 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. SCO charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.31%/yr for BOIL.
Performance
SCO vs. BOIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCO achieves a -65.39% return, which is significantly lower than BOIL's -55.20% return. Over the past 10 years, SCO has outperformed BOIL with an annualized return of -40.39%, while BOIL has yielded a comparatively lower -58.99% annualized return.
SCO
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- -23.78%
- 6M
- -55.81%
- YTD
- -65.39%
- 1Y
- -58.66%
- 3Y*
- -29.81%
- 5Y*
- -39.67%
- 10Y*
- -40.39%
- ALL TIME*
- -26.09%
BOIL
- 1D
- 1.23%
- 1M
- -22.39%
- 6M
- -74.77%
- YTD
- -55.20%
- 1Y
- -71.40%
- 3Y*
- -67.40%
- 5Y*
- -69.84%
- 10Y*
- -58.99%
- ALL TIME*
- -57.95%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $86.80M | $100.03M | $104.47M | |
| $131.70M | $126.01M | $253.57M |
SCO vs. BOIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCO ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil | -65.39% | 15.90% | -19.00% | -12.41% | -62.59% | -72.62% | -4.20% | -58.50% | 19.22% | -22.40% |
BOIL ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas | -55.20% | -58.98% | -60.75% | -92.00% | -31.85% | 23.84% | -74.74% | -67.70% | -20.55% | -65.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCO and BOIL is -0.24, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | -0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2011 | -0.12 |
The correlation between SCO and BOIL shifts across timeframes, from -0.24 (1 year) to -0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCO vs. BOIL — Risk / Return Rank
SCO
BOIL
SCO vs. BOIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil (SCO) and ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas (BOIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCO | BOIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 0.91 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.78 | -0.92 | +0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.32 | -1.40 | +0.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCO vs. BOIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCO drawdown since its inception was -99.80%, roughly equal to the maximum BOIL drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCO and BOIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCO | BOIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.80% | -100.00% | +0.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.24% | -77.68% | +5.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -74.64% | -97.48% | +22.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -94.80% | -99.93% | +5.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.50% | -99.99% | +0.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.77% | -100.00% | +0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -85.28% | -93.63% | +8.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 42.39% | 50.79% | -8.40% |
Volatility
SCO vs. BOIL - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil (SCO) has a higher volatility of 23.27% compared to ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas (BOIL) at 18.90%. This indicates that SCO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCO | BOIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.27% | 18.90% | +4.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.24% | 91.55% | -40.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.66% | 110.59% | -50.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.43% | 118.92% | -58.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.89% | 101.64% | -29.75% |
SCO vs. BOIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than BOIL's 1.31% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCO vs. BOIL - Dividend Comparison
Neither SCO nor BOIL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SCO and BOIL have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCO has higher volatility (23.27%) compared to BOIL (18.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCO dropped -99.80% vs BOIL's -100.00%.
On 10-year performance, SCO leads with -40.39% vs -58.99% for BOIL. On fees, SCO is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, BOIL has been the lower-risk option at 18.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCO has performed better with a -40.39% return vs -58.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCO is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for BOIL.
SCO and BOIL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
SCO tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index (-200%), while BOIL tracks Bloomberg Natural Gas Subindex. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SCO and 1.31% for BOIL.
BOIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.65 vs -0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCO and BOIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer