SCO vs. BOIL
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil (SCO) and ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas (BOIL).
SCO and BOIL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SCO is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index (-200%). It was launched on Nov 24, 2008. BOIL is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones-UBS Natural Gas Subindex (200%). It was launched on Oct 4, 2011. Both SCO and BOIL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SCO or BOIL.
Correlation
The correlation between SCO and BOIL is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
SCO vs. BOIL - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
SCO:
0.51
BOIL:
-0.30
SCO:
1.07
BOIL:
0.25
SCO:
1.12
BOIL:
1.03
SCO:
0.25
BOIL:
-0.33
SCO:
1.70
BOIL:
-0.67
SCO:
14.92%
BOIL:
48.47%
SCO:
49.53%
BOIL:
107.69%
SCO:
-99.50%
BOIL:
-100.00%
SCO:
-99.32%
BOIL:
-100.00%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCO achieves a 18.20% return, which is significantly higher than BOIL's -14.12% return. Over the past 10 years, SCO has outperformed BOIL with an annualized return of -28.99%, while BOIL has yielded a comparatively lower -56.56% annualized return.
SCO
18.20%
13.90%
11.67%
28.04%
-53.43%
-28.99%
BOIL
-14.12%
-37.05%
3.21%
-28.82%
-60.49%
-56.56%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SCO vs. BOIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than BOIL's 1.31% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SCO vs. BOIL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
SCO
BOIL
SCO vs. BOIL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil (SCO) and ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas (BOIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SCO vs. BOIL - Dividend Comparison
Neither SCO nor BOIL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
SCO vs. BOIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCO drawdown since its inception was -99.50%, roughly equal to the maximum BOIL drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCO and BOIL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SCO vs. BOIL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil (SCO) is 23.53%, while ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas (BOIL) has a volatility of 34.58%. This indicates that SCO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.