PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
SCHZ vs. UCO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

SCHZ vs. UCO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SCHZ (Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF) and UCO (ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHZ is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index, while UCO is a Leveraged Commodities fund tracking the Dow Jones-UBS Crude Oil Sub-Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHZ returned 1.52%/yr vs -11.31%/yr for UCO. At a correlation of -0.15, they often move in opposite directions. SCHZ charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for UCO.

Performance

SCHZ vs. UCO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ) and ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHZ achieves a 0.30% return, which is significantly lower than UCO's 149.12% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHZ has outperformed UCO with an annualized return of 1.52%, while UCO has yielded a comparatively lower -11.31% annualized return.

SCHZ

1D
-0.17%
1M
0.26%
YTD
0.30%
6M
0.15%
1Y
5.16%
3Y*
3.94%
5Y*
0.07%
10Y*
1.52%

UCO

1D
2.71%
1M
-4.64%
YTD
149.12%
6M
137.09%
1Y
120.48%
3Y*
25.90%
5Y*
22.16%
10Y*
-11.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHZ vs. UCO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHZ
Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF		0.30%7.24%1.26%5.60%-13.17%-1.72%7.46%8.65%-0.26%3.50%
UCO
ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil		149.12%-29.75%5.36%-13.89%39.71%139.26%-92.91%53.83%-43.26%0.34%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHZ and UCO is -0.38, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2011

-0.15

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between SCHZ and UCO has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.15 to -0.38, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF

ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil

Often compared with SCHZ:
SCHZ vs. BNDSCHZ vs. SCHPSCHZ vs. SWAGXSCHZ vs. SCHDSCHZ vs. AGGSCHZ vs. BONDSCHZ vs. SPAB
Often compared with UCO:
UCO vs. USOUCO vs. SCOUCO vs. OILUUCO vs. BOILUCO vs. ERXUCO vs. LABUUCO vs. OIH

Return for Risk

SCHZ vs. UCO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
SCHZ
SCHZ Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
SCHZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
UCO
UCO Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
UCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
UCO Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
UCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
UCO Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHZ vs. UCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ) and ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

SCHZUCODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.37
2.12

-0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.04
2.46

-0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.32

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

3.49

-1.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.87

6.60

-0.73

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SCHZ vs. UCO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the UCO Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHZ and UCO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

SCHZUCODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

2.12

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

0.37

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

-0.16

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

-0.34

+0.78

Drawdowns

SCHZ vs. UCO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHZ drawdown since its inception was -18.74%, smaller than the maximum UCO drawdown of -99.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHZ and UCO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

SCHZUCODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.74%

-99.95%

+81.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.70%

-34.77%

+32.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.18%

-50.38%

+44.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.01%

-67.24%

+49.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.74%

-98.75%

+80.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.47%

-99.23%

+96.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.68%

-85.49%

+81.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

18.33%

-17.45%

Volatility

SCHZ vs. UCO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ) is 1.24%, while ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO) has a volatility of 20.83%. This indicates that SCHZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

SCHZUCODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.24%

20.83%

-19.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.67%

46.44%

-43.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.79%

57.11%

-53.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.08%

59.78%

-53.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.41%

71.36%

-65.95%

SCHZ vs. UCO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHZ has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than UCO's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

SCHZ vs. UCO - Dividend Comparison

SCHZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, while UCO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHZ
Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF		4.12%4.05%3.96%3.28%2.63%2.16%2.43%2.79%2.56%2.40%2.24%2.11%
UCO
ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

SCHZ and UCO have a correlation of -0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UCO has higher volatility (20.83%) compared to SCHZ (1.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHZ dropped -18.74% vs UCO's -99.95%.

On 10-year performance, SCHZ leads with 1.52% vs -11.31% for UCO. On fees, SCHZ is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHZ has been the lower-risk option at 1.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHZ has performed better with a 1.52% return vs -11.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHZ is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UCO.

SCHZ has the higher dividend yield at 4.12%, compared with 0.00% for UCO.

SCHZ is categorized as Total Bond Market, while UCO is Leveraged Commodities. SCHZ tracks Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index, while UCO tracks Dow Jones-UBS Crude Oil Sub-Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SCHZ and 0.95% for UCO.

UCO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHZ and UCO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer