SCHZ vs. SCHP
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ) and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP).
SCHZ and SCHP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SCHZ is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Aggregate. It was launched on Jul 14, 2011. SCHP is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Barclays Capital U.S. Treasury Inflation Protected Securities (TIPS) Index (Series-L). It was launched on Aug 5, 2010. Both SCHZ and SCHP are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SCHZ or SCHP.
Key characteristics
| SCHZ | SCHP | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -1.26% | -0.12% |
| 1Y Return | 1.79% | 1.10% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -2.89% | -1.44% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 0.07% | 2.30% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 1.24% | 1.88% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.20 | 0.14 |
| Daily Std Dev | 6.72% | 5.86% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.74% | -14.26% |
| Current Drawdown | -11.58% | -9.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHZ and SCHP is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
SCHZ vs. SCHP - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, SCHZ achieves a -1.26% return, which is significantly lower than SCHP's -0.12% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHZ has underperformed SCHP with an annualized return of 1.24%, while SCHP has yielded a comparatively higher 1.88% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SCHZ vs. SCHP - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHZ has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than SCHP's 0.05% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SCHZ vs. SCHP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ) and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SCHZ vs. SCHP - Dividend Comparison
SCHZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, more than SCHP's 3.10% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHZ Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 3.60% | 3.28% | 2.63% | 2.16% | 2.43% | 2.79% | 2.79% | 2.40% | 2.24% | 2.11% | 2.03% | 2.01% |
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 3.10% | 3.02% | 7.19% | 4.39% | 1.11% | 2.02% | 2.63% | 1.90% | 1.38% | 0.28% | 1.30% | 0.67% |
Drawdowns
SCHZ vs. SCHP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHZ drawdown since its inception was -18.74%, which is greater than SCHP's maximum drawdown of -14.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHZ and SCHP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SCHZ vs. SCHP - Volatility Comparison
Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ) has a higher volatility of 1.38% compared to Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) at 1.11%. This indicates that SCHZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.