SCHZ vs. SCHG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SCHZ (Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHZ is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index, while SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHZ returned 1.52%/yr vs 18.77%/yr for SCHG. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. SCHZ charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.

Performance

SCHZ vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHZ achieves a 0.30% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 6.42% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHZ has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 1.52%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.77% annualized return.

SCHZ

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 0.26%
• YTD: 0.30%
• 6M: 0.15%
• 1Y: 5.16%
• 3Y*: 3.94%
• 5Y*: 0.07%
• 10Y*: 1.52%

SCHG

• 1D: -1.23%
• 1M: 4.81%
• YTD: 6.42%
• 6M: 5.81%
• 1Y: 24.64%
• 3Y*: 25.02%
• 5Y*: 15.59%
• 10Y*: 18.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHZ vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SCHZ Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF	0.30%	7.24%	1.26%	5.60%	-13.17%	-1.72%	7.46%	8.65%	-0.26%	3.50%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	6.42%	17.50%	34.95%	50.10%	-31.80%	28.11%	39.14%	36.02%	-1.36%	28.05%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHZ and SCHG is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.18
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.17
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2011	-0.03

The correlation between SCHZ and SCHG shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (all time) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SCHZ vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SCHZ	SCHG
Financial Services	8.3%	6.7%
Technology	3.0%	46.3%
Healthcare	2.3%	7.7%
Utilities	2.1%	0.4%
Communication Services	2.1%	16.0%
Industrials	1.7%	5.8%
Consumer Cyclical	1.4%	12.7%
Energy	1.3%	0.8%
Consumer Defensive	1.1%	1.7%
Real Estate	0.8%	0.5%
Basic Materials	0.4%	1.4%

Return for Risk

SCHZ vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHZ

SCHZ Risk / Return Rank: 37
SCHZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
SCHZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
SCHZ Omega Ratio Rank: 35
SCHZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
SCHZ Martin Ratio Rank: 37

SCHG

SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 39
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 43
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHZ vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SCHZ	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.37	1.60	-0.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.04	2.18	-0.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.28	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.92	1.51	+0.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.87	5.04	+0.83
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SCHZ vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHZ and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SCHZ	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.37	1.60	-0.23
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.01	0.70	-0.69
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.28	0.87	-0.59
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	0.84	-0.40

Drawdowns

SCHZ vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHZ drawdown since its inception was -18.74%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHZ and SCHG.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCHZ	SCHG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.74%	-34.59%	+15.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.70%	-16.41%	+13.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.18%	-23.39%	+17.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.01%	-34.59%	+16.58%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-18.74%	-34.59%	+15.85%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.47%	-1.78%	-0.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.68%	-5.20%	+1.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.88%	4.90%	-4.02%

Volatility

SCHZ vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ) is 1.24%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 3.61%. This indicates that SCHZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCHZ	SCHG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.24%	3.61%	-2.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.67%	11.62%	-8.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.79%	15.50%	-11.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.08%	22.27%	-16.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.41%	21.55%	-16.14%

SCHZ vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHZ has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SCHZ vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

SCHZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, more than SCHG's 0.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	0.36%	0.36%	0.39%	0.46%	0.55%	0.42%	0.52%	0.82%	1.27%	1.01%	1.04%	1.22%
SCHZ Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF	4.12%	4.05%	3.96%	3.28%	2.63%	2.16%	2.43%	2.79%	2.56%	2.40%	2.24%	2.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCHZ and SCHG in my portfolio?

SCHZ and SCHG have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SCHZ or SCHG?

SCHG has higher volatility (3.61%) compared to SCHZ (1.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHZ dropped -18.74% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

Which ETF is better, SCHZ or SCHG?

On 10-year performance, SCHG leads with 18.77% vs 1.52% for SCHZ. On fees, SCHZ is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHZ has been the lower-risk option at 1.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SCHZ or SCHG?

Over the 10-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 18.77% return vs 1.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SCHZ or SCHG?

SCHZ is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for SCHG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SCHZ or SCHG?

SCHZ has the higher dividend yield at 4.12%, compared with 0.36% for SCHG.

What is the main difference between SCHZ and SCHG?

SCHZ is categorized as Total Bond Market, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. SCHZ tracks Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SCHZ and 0.04% for SCHG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.