SCHY vs. GCOW
SCHY (Schwab International Dividend Equity ETF) and GCOW (Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHY is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones International Dividend 100 Index (Net), while GCOW is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SCHY returned 9.15%/yr vs 13.23%/yr for GCOW. Their correlation of 0.86 means they have usually moved in the same direction. SCHY charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for GCOW.
Performance
SCHY vs. GCOW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SCHY having a 14.32% return and GCOW slightly higher at 14.53%.
SCHY
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 4.49%
- 6M
- 6.33%
- YTD
- 14.32%
- 1Y
- 27.64%
- 3Y*
- 16.91%
- 5Y*
- 9.15%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.47%
GCOW
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 5.25%
- 6M
- 5.40%
- YTD
- 14.53%
- 1Y
- 26.76%
- 3Y*
- 16.49%
- 5Y*
- 13.23%
- 10Y*
- 9.81%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.53%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $12.92M | $12.70M | $12.24M | |
| $27.21M | $25.61M | $19.67M |
SCHY vs. GCOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHY Schwab International Dividend Equity ETF | 14.32% | 33.98% | -1.79% | 14.27% | -9.43% | 3.42% |
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF | 14.53% | 27.34% | 3.52% | 13.95% | 5.49% | 4.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHY and GCOW is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2021 | 0.86 |
The correlation between SCHY and GCOW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCHY vs. GCOW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHY
GCOW
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
SCHY
GCOW
Financial Services
SCHY
GCOW
-
Communication Services
SCHY
GCOW
Technology
SCHY
GCOW
Industrials
SCHY
GCOW
Healthcare
SCHY
GCOW
Consumer Cyclical
SCHY
GCOW
Energy
SCHY
GCOW
Utilities
SCHY
GCOW
Basic Materials
SCHY
GCOW
Real Estate
SCHY
GCOW
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHY vs. GCOW — Risk / Return Rank
SCHY
GCOW
SCHY vs. GCOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab International Dividend Equity ETF (SCHY) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHY | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.44 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.05 | 3.43 | -0.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.68 | 10.60 | -1.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHY vs. GCOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHY drawdown since its inception was -24.04%, smaller than the maximum GCOW drawdown of -37.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHY and GCOW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHY | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.04% | -37.64% | +13.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.11% | -7.83% | -1.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.16% | -12.35% | +0.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.04% | -21.48% | -2.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.03% | -0.94% | +0.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.92% | -5.81% | +0.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.19% | 2.53% | +0.66% |
Volatility
SCHY vs. GCOW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab International Dividend Equity ETF (SCHY) is 2.58%, while Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) has a volatility of 2.95%. This indicates that SCHY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GCOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHY | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.58% | 2.95% | -0.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.01% | 8.54% | +1.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.01% | 10.88% | +1.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.27% | 13.54% | -0.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.17% | 16.01% | -2.84% |
SCHY vs. GCOW - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHY has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than GCOW's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCHY vs. GCOW - Dividend Comparison
SCHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.31%, less than GCOW's 4.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF | 4.59% | 4.06% | 5.14% | 5.28% | 4.39% | 4.23% | 4.12% | 4.40% | 3.94% | 2.79% | 1.95% |
SCHY Schwab International Dividend Equity ETF | 3.31% | 3.55% | 4.64% | 3.97% | 3.67% | 1.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHY and GCOW have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GCOW has higher volatility (2.95%) compared to SCHY (2.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHY dropped -24.04% vs GCOW's -37.64%.
On 5-year performance, GCOW leads with 13.23% vs 9.15% for SCHY. On fees, SCHY is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, SCHY has been the lower-risk option at 2.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GCOW has performed better with a 13.23% return vs 9.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHY is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for GCOW.
GCOW has the higher dividend yield at 4.59%, compared with 3.31% for SCHY.
SCHY is categorized as Dividend, while GCOW is Large Cap Value Equities. SCHY tracks Dow Jones International Dividend 100 Index (Net), while GCOW tracks Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for SCHY and 0.60% for GCOW.
GCOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHY and GCOW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer