SCHV vs. SPYV
SCHV (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF) and SPYV (SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index, while SPYV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Value. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHV returned 11.50%/yr vs 11.90%/yr for SPYV. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.04% expense ratio.
Performance
SCHV vs. SPYV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHV achieves a 15.39% return, which is significantly higher than SPYV's 7.46% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SCHV having a 11.50% annualized return and SPYV not far ahead at 11.90%.
SCHV
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 5.65%
- YTD
- 15.39%
- 6M
- 16.00%
- 1Y
- 28.49%
- 3Y*
- 18.86%
- 5Y*
- 10.40%
- 10Y*
- 11.50%
SPYV
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 2.22%
- YTD
- 7.46%
- 6M
- 7.77%
- 1Y
- 21.26%
- 3Y*
- 15.72%
- 5Y*
- 10.68%
- 10Y*
- 11.90%
SCHV vs. SPYV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF | 15.39% | 16.02% | 14.13% | 8.93% | -7.65% | 25.58% | 2.64% | 25.92% | -7.30% | 16.56% |
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | 7.46% | 13.18% | 12.24% | 22.20% | -5.28% | 24.91% | 1.38% | 31.70% | -9.01% | 15.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHV and SPYV is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2009 | 0.96 |
The correlation between SCHV and SPYV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCHV vs. SPYV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHV
SPYV
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Financial Services
SCHV
SPYV
Technology
SCHV
SPYV
Industrials
SCHV
SPYV
Healthcare
SCHV
SPYV
Consumer Defensive
SCHV
SPYV
Energy
SCHV
SPYV
Consumer Cyclical
SCHV
SPYV
Utilities
SCHV
SPYV
Real Estate
SCHV
SPYV
Basic Materials
SCHV
SPYV
Communication Services
SCHV
SPYV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHV vs. SPYV — Risk / Return Rank
SCHV
SPYV
SCHV vs. SPYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCHV | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.39 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.19 | 3.43 | +0.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.96 | 13.16 | +3.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCHV | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.69 | 2.17 | +0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 0.75 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | 0.70 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.42 | +0.30 |
Drawdowns
SCHV vs. SPYV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHV drawdown since its inception was -37.08%, smaller than the maximum SPYV drawdown of -58.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHV and SPYV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHV | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.08% | -58.45% | +21.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.83% | -6.22% | -0.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.26% | -17.54% | +2.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.78% | -17.89% | -1.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.08% | -36.89% | -0.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.57% | +0.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.83% | -8.72% | +4.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.69% | 1.62% | +0.07% |
Volatility
SCHV vs. SPYV - Volatility Comparison
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) has a higher volatility of 3.09% compared to SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) at 1.98%. This indicates that SCHV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHV | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.09% | 1.98% | +1.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.13% | 7.04% | +1.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.63% | 9.84% | +0.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.51% | 14.40% | +0.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.94% | 16.94% | 0.00% |
SCHV vs. SPYV - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SCHV and SPYV have an expense ratio of 0.04%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHV vs. SPYV - Dividend Comparison
SCHV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, more than SPYV's 1.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF | 1.76% | 2.02% | 2.25% | 2.42% | 2.37% | 1.93% | 3.03% | 3.02% | 3.05% | 2.37% | 2.65% | 2.69% |
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | 1.70% | 1.77% | 2.29% | 1.75% | 2.22% | 2.10% | 2.38% | 2.25% | 2.97% | 2.77% | 2.39% | 2.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, SCHV and SPYV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCHV has higher volatility (3.09%) compared to SPYV (1.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHV dropped -37.08% vs SPYV's -58.45%.
On 10-year performance, SPYV leads with 11.90% vs 11.50% for SCHV. Both ETFs have the same 0.04% expense ratio. On volatility, SPYV has been the lower-risk option at 1.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPYV has performed better with a 11.90% return vs 11.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHV and SPYV have the same expense ratio: 0.04% per year.
SCHV has the higher dividend yield at 1.76%, compared with 1.70% for SPYV.
SCHV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SPYV is S&P 500. SCHV tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index, while SPYV tracks S&P 500 Value. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and State Street.
SCHV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHV and SPYV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer