SCHV vs. SMLV
SCHV (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF) and SMLV (SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index, while SMLV is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHV returned 10.94%/yr vs 10.42%/yr for SMLV. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCHV charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for SMLV.
Performance
SCHV vs. SMLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHV achieves a 14.69% return, which is significantly lower than SMLV's 22.24% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SCHV having a 10.94% annualized return and SMLV not far behind at 10.42%.
SCHV
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- -2.19%
- 6M
- 9.69%
- YTD
- 14.69%
- 1Y
- 22.64%
- 3Y*
- 16.15%
- 5Y*
- 10.49%
- 10Y*
- 10.94%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.54%
SMLV
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 4.61%
- 6M
- 15.91%
- YTD
- 22.24%
- 1Y
- 28.48%
- 3Y*
- 17.10%
- 5Y*
- 10.21%
- 10Y*
- 10.42%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.06%
SCHV vs. SMLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF | 14.69% | 16.02% | 14.13% | 8.93% | -7.65% | 25.58% | 2.64% | 25.92% | -7.30% | 16.56% |
SMLV SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF | 22.24% | 5.66% | 16.77% | 7.52% | -7.69% | 27.67% | -1.55% | 24.10% | -6.62% | 5.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHV and SMLV is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2013 | 0.80 |
The correlation between SCHV and SMLV shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.82 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SCHV vs. SMLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHV
SMLV
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Technology
SCHV
SMLV
Financial Services
SCHV
SMLV
Industrials
SCHV
SMLV
Healthcare
SCHV
SMLV
Consumer Defensive
SCHV
SMLV
Consumer Cyclical
SCHV
SMLV
Energy
SCHV
SMLV
Utilities
SCHV
SMLV
Real Estate
SCHV
SMLV
Basic Materials
SCHV
SMLV
Communication Services
SCHV
SMLV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHV vs. SMLV — Risk / Return Rank
SCHV
SMLV
SCHV vs. SMLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) and SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHV | SMLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.34 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.33 | 3.90 | -0.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.95 | 10.99 | +1.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHV vs. SMLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHV drawdown since its inception was -37.08%, smaller than the maximum SMLV drawdown of -42.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHV and SMLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHV | SMLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.08% | -42.45% | +5.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.83% | -7.34% | +0.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.26% | -20.40% | +5.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.78% | -20.40% | +0.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.08% | -42.45% | +5.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.42% | -1.59% | -1.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.81% | -5.41% | +1.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.75% | 2.60% | -0.85% |
Volatility
SCHV vs. SMLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) is 3.33%, while SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) has a volatility of 3.75%. This indicates that SCHV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHV | SMLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.33% | 3.75% | -0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.87% | 10.09% | -1.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.21% | 15.46% | -4.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.52% | 18.23% | -3.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.92% | 20.91% | -3.99% |
SCHV vs. SMLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than SMLV's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHV vs. SMLV - Dividend Comparison
SCHV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, less than SMLV's 2.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF | 1.82% | 2.02% | 2.25% | 2.42% | 2.37% | 1.93% | 3.03% | 3.02% | 3.05% | 2.37% | 2.65% | 2.69% |
SMLV SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF | 2.23% | 2.74% | 2.68% | 2.68% | 2.40% | 2.12% | 2.47% | 2.62% | 3.15% | 7.92% | 3.04% | 2.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHV and SMLV have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMLV has higher volatility (3.75%) compared to SCHV (3.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHV dropped -37.08% vs SMLV's -42.45%.
On 10-year performance, SCHV leads with 10.94% vs 10.42% for SMLV. On fees, SCHV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHV has been the lower-risk option at 3.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHV has performed better with a 10.94% return vs 10.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for SMLV.
SMLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.23%, compared with 1.82% for SCHV.
SCHV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SMLV is Volatility Hedged Equity. SCHV tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index, while SMLV tracks SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SCHV and 0.12% for SMLV.
SCHV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHV and SMLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer