SCHR vs. VOT
SCHR (Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF) and VOT (Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHR is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury 3-10 Year Index, while VOT is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mid Cap Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHR returned 1.15%/yr vs 11.95%/yr for VOT. At a correlation of -0.16, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.05% expense ratio.
Performance
SCHR vs. VOT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHR achieves a -0.76% return, which is significantly lower than VOT's 5.49% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHR has underperformed VOT with an annualized return of 1.15%, while VOT has yielded a comparatively higher 11.95% annualized return.
SCHR
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -0.88%
- YTD
- -0.76%
- 6M
- -0.40%
- 1Y
- 3.59%
- 3Y*
- 3.39%
- 5Y*
- -0.07%
- 10Y*
- 1.15%
VOT
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 1.80%
- YTD
- 5.49%
- 6M
- 3.73%
- 1Y
- 7.75%
- 3Y*
- 15.09%
- 5Y*
- 6.19%
- 10Y*
- 11.95%
SCHR vs. VOT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHR Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | -0.76% | 7.33% | 1.42% | 4.27% | -10.58% | -2.62% | 7.72% | 6.18% | 1.46% | 1.59% |
VOT Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 5.49% | 10.72% | 16.38% | 23.10% | -28.87% | 20.50% | 34.50% | 33.76% | -5.56% | 21.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHR and VOT is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2010 | -0.16 |
The correlation between SCHR and VOT shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (all time) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SCHR vs. VOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHR
VOT
Technology
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
SCHR
VOT
Financial Services
SCHR
VOT
Basic Materials
SCHR
-
VOT
Communication Services
SCHR
-
VOT
Consumer Cyclical
SCHR
-
VOT
Consumer Defensive
SCHR
-
VOT
Energy
SCHR
-
VOT
Healthcare
SCHR
-
VOT
Industrials
SCHR
-
VOT
Real Estate
SCHR
-
VOT
Utilities
SCHR
-
VOT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHR vs. VOT — Risk / Return Rank
SCHR
VOT
SCHR vs. VOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHR) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCHR | VOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.09 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | 0.49 | +0.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.75 | 1.46 | +2.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCHR | VOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.07 | 0.48 | +0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 | 0.29 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | 0.57 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.44 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
SCHR vs. VOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHR drawdown since its inception was -16.11%, smaller than the maximum VOT drawdown of -60.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHR and VOT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHR | VOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.11% | -60.16% | +44.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.79% | -15.96% | +13.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.35% | -21.77% | +17.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.07% | -37.19% | +22.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.11% | -37.19% | +21.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.69% | -3.48% | +0.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.64% | -9.96% | +6.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.96% | 5.33% | -4.37% |
Volatility
SCHR vs. VOT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHR) is 1.04%, while Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) has a volatility of 5.45%. This indicates that SCHR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHR | VOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.04% | 5.45% | -4.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.36% | 12.85% | -10.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.36% | 16.20% | -12.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.38% | 21.41% | -16.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.47% | 21.02% | -16.55% |
SCHR vs. VOT - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SCHR and VOT have an expense ratio of 0.05%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHR vs. VOT - Dividend Comparison
SCHR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%, more than VOT's 0.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHR Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | 3.93% | 3.85% | 3.77% | 3.16% | 2.02% | 1.00% | 1.62% | 2.31% | 2.11% | 1.65% | 1.45% | 1.56% |
VOT Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 0.63% | 0.64% | 0.67% | 0.71% | 0.78% | 0.34% | 0.56% | 0.78% | 0.84% | 0.72% | 0.81% | 0.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHR and VOT have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VOT has higher volatility (5.45%) compared to SCHR (1.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHR dropped -16.11% vs VOT's -60.16%.
On 10-year performance, VOT leads with 11.95% vs 1.15% for SCHR. Both ETFs have the same 0.05% expense ratio. On volatility, SCHR has been the lower-risk option at 1.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VOT has performed better with a 11.95% return vs 1.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHR and VOT have the same expense ratio: 0.05% per year.
SCHR has the higher dividend yield at 3.93%, compared with 0.63% for VOT.
SCHR is categorized as Government Bonds, while VOT is Mid Cap Growth Equities. SCHR tracks Bloomberg US Treasury 3-10 Year Index, while VOT tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Vanguard.
SCHR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHR and VOT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer