PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHR vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHR vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHR) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHR achieves a -0.43% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 6.42% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHR has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 1.23%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.77% annualized return.


SCHR

1D
-0.16%
1M
-0.15%
YTD
-0.43%
6M
-0.59%
1Y
3.55%
3Y*
3.41%
5Y*
0.05%
10Y*
1.23%

SCHG

1D
-1.23%
1M
4.81%
YTD
6.42%
6M
5.81%
1Y
24.64%
3Y*
25.02%
5Y*
15.59%
10Y*
18.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHR vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHR
Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
-0.43%7.33%1.42%4.27%-10.58%-2.62%7.72%6.18%1.46%1.59%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
6.42%17.50%34.95%50.10%-31.80%28.11%39.14%36.02%-1.36%28.05%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHR and SCHG is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2010

-0.18

The correlation between SCHR and SCHG shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (all time) to 0.14 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SCHR vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHR
SCHG

Technology

1.2%
46.3%

Financial Services

0.4%
6.7%

Basic Materials

-

1.4%

Communication Services

-

16.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

1.7%

Energy

-

0.8%

Healthcare

-

7.7%

Industrials

-

5.8%

Real Estate

-

0.5%

Utilities

-

0.4%

Technology

SCHR
1.2%
SCHG
46.3%

Financial Services

SCHR
0.4%
SCHG
6.7%

Basic Materials

SCHR

-

SCHG
1.4%

Communication Services

SCHR

-

SCHG
16.0%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHR

-

SCHG
12.7%

Consumer Defensive

SCHR

-

SCHG
1.7%

Energy

SCHR

-

SCHG
0.8%

Healthcare

SCHR

-

SCHG
7.7%

Industrials

SCHR

-

SCHG
5.8%

Real Estate

SCHR

-

SCHG
0.5%

Utilities

SCHR

-

SCHG
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHR vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHR
SCHR Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
SCHR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHR Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHR Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHR vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHR) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCHRSCHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.28

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.27

1.51

-0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.82

5.04

-1.22

SCHR vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHR Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is lower than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHR and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCHRSCHGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.04

1.60

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

0.70

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

0.87

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.84

-0.40

Drawdowns

SCHR vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHR drawdown since its inception was -16.11%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHR and SCHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHRSCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.11%

-34.59%

+18.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.79%

-16.41%

+13.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.35%

-23.39%

+19.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.07%

-34.59%

+19.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.11%

-34.59%

+18.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.37%

-1.78%

-0.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.64%

-5.20%

+1.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.93%

4.90%

-3.97%

Volatility

SCHR vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHR) is 1.08%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 3.61%. This indicates that SCHR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHRSCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.08%

3.61%

-2.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.35%

11.62%

-9.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.43%

15.50%

-12.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.38%

22.27%

-16.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.47%

21.55%

-17.08%

SCHR vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHR has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHR vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

SCHR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%, more than SCHG's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.36%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%
SCHR
Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
3.92%3.85%3.77%3.16%2.02%1.00%1.62%2.31%2.11%1.65%1.45%1.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHR and SCHG have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHG has higher volatility (3.61%) compared to SCHR (1.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHR dropped -16.11% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

On 10-year performance, SCHG leads with 18.77% vs 1.23% for SCHR. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHR has been the lower-risk option at 1.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 18.77% return vs 1.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for SCHR.

SCHR has the higher dividend yield at 3.92%, compared with 0.36% for SCHG.

SCHR is categorized as Government Bonds, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. SCHR tracks Bloomberg US Treasury 3-10 Year Index, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SCHR and 0.04% for SCHG.

SCHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHR and SCHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer