SCHP vs. PHYS
SCHP (Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF) is Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L), while PHYS (Sprott Physical Gold Trust) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, SCHP returned 2.60%/yr vs 11.42%/yr for PHYS. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SCHP vs. PHYS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHP achieves a 1.42% return, which is significantly higher than PHYS's -3.85% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHP has underperformed PHYS with an annualized return of 2.60%, while PHYS has yielded a comparatively higher 11.42% annualized return.
SCHP
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- YTD
- 1.42%
- 6M
- 1.48%
- 1Y
- 4.83%
- 3Y*
- 4.14%
- 5Y*
- 1.06%
- 10Y*
- 2.60%
PHYS
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -9.95%
- YTD
- -3.85%
- 6M
- -3.47%
- 1Y
- 20.77%
- 3Y*
- 28.00%
- 5Y*
- 16.26%
- 10Y*
- 11.42%
SCHP vs. PHYS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 1.42% | 6.76% | 1.95% | 3.91% | -12.02% | 5.87% | 10.86% | 8.52% | -1.78% | 3.02% |
PHYS Sprott Physical Gold Trust | -3.85% | 63.95% | 26.43% | 12.98% | -1.81% | -4.84% | 23.89% | 18.14% | -2.64% | 12.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHP and PHYS is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2010 | 0.32 |
The correlation between SCHP and PHYS shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.39 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHP vs. PHYS — Risk / Return Rank
SCHP
PHYS
SCHP vs. PHYS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) and Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHP | PHYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.17 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.45 | 0.92 | +1.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.41 | 2.64 | +4.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHP vs. PHYS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHP drawdown since its inception was -14.26%, smaller than the maximum PHYS drawdown of -48.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHP and PHYS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHP | PHYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.26% | -48.16% | +33.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.93% | -24.80% | +22.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.48% | -24.80% | +20.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.26% | -24.80% | +10.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.26% | -24.80% | +10.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.44% | -22.43% | +21.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.93% | -20.99% | +17.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.64% | 8.60% | -7.96% |
Volatility
SCHP vs. PHYS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) is 1.02%, while Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS) has a volatility of 7.80%. This indicates that SCHP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PHYS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHP | PHYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.02% | 7.80% | -6.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.24% | 24.75% | -22.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.30% | 28.17% | -24.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.12% | 18.53% | -12.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.59% | 16.41% | -10.82% |
Dividends
SCHP vs. PHYS - Dividend Comparison
SCHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.99%, while PHYS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHYS Sprott Physical Gold Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 3.99% | 4.06% | 2.99% | 3.02% | 7.19% | 4.39% | 1.11% | 2.02% | 2.26% | 1.90% | 1.38% | 0.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHP and PHYS have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PHYS has higher volatility (7.80%) compared to SCHP (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHP dropped -14.26% vs PHYS's -48.16%.
SCHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHP and PHYS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer