SCHM vs. VXF
SCHM (Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF) and VXF (Vanguard Extended Market ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - SCHM tracks the Dow Jones US Total Stock Market Mid-Cap while VXF tracks the S&P Completion Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHM returned 12.31%/yr vs 12.99%/yr for VXF. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SCHM charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VXF.
Performance
SCHM vs. VXF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHM achieves a 22.04% return, which is significantly higher than VXF's 15.63% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHM has underperformed VXF with an annualized return of 12.31%, while VXF has yielded a comparatively higher 12.99% annualized return.
SCHM
- 1D
- 1.96%
- 1M
- 4.00%
- YTD
- 22.04%
- 6M
- 19.62%
- 1Y
- 34.41%
- 3Y*
- 18.54%
- 5Y*
- 8.42%
- 10Y*
- 12.31%
VXF
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 2.77%
- YTD
- 15.63%
- 6M
- 13.10%
- 1Y
- 28.85%
- 3Y*
- 20.23%
- 5Y*
- 6.09%
- 10Y*
- 12.99%
SCHM vs. VXF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHM Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF | 22.04% | 10.17% | 11.98% | 16.69% | -17.07% | 19.36% | 15.26% | 27.48% | -8.77% | 19.60% |
VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | 15.63% | 11.40% | 16.89% | 25.51% | -26.52% | 12.31% | 32.45% | 27.96% | -9.34% | 18.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHM and VXF is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2011 | 0.97 |
The correlation between SCHM and VXF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCHM vs. VXF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHM
VXF
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Technology
SCHM
VXF
Industrials
SCHM
VXF
Financial Services
SCHM
VXF
Healthcare
SCHM
VXF
Consumer Cyclical
SCHM
VXF
Real Estate
SCHM
VXF
Basic Materials
SCHM
VXF
Consumer Defensive
SCHM
VXF
Energy
SCHM
VXF
Utilities
SCHM
VXF
Communication Services
SCHM
VXF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHM vs. VXF — Risk / Return Rank
SCHM
VXF
SCHM vs. VXF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) and Vanguard Extended Market ETF (VXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHM | VXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.28 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.71 | 2.84 | +0.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.81 | 9.98 | +4.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHM vs. VXF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHM drawdown since its inception was -42.43%, smaller than the maximum VXF drawdown of -58.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHM and VXF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHM | VXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.43% | -58.03% | +15.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.32% | -10.21% | +0.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.27% | -26.92% | +3.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.46% | -36.39% | +9.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.43% | -41.72% | -0.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.12% | +0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.64% | -9.53% | +3.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.33% | 2.90% | -0.57% |
Volatility
SCHM vs. VXF - Volatility Comparison
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) and Vanguard Extended Market ETF (VXF) have volatilities of 5.91% and 5.97%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHM | VXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.91% | 5.97% | -0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.69% | 13.20% | -0.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.37% | 17.77% | -1.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.68% | 22.43% | -2.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.49% | 22.30% | -1.81% |
SCHM vs. VXF - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHM has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than VXF's 0.05% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHM vs. VXF - Dividend Comparison
SCHM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, less than VXF's 1.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHM Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF | 1.21% | 1.46% | 1.43% | 1.50% | 1.67% | 1.13% | 1.31% | 1.48% | 1.56% | 1.27% | 1.51% | 1.54% |
VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | 1.24% | 1.14% | 1.09% | 1.27% | 1.15% | 1.13% | 1.07% | 1.30% | 1.66% | 1.25% | 1.43% | 1.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, SCHM and VXF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VXF has higher volatility (5.97%) compared to SCHM (5.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHM dropped -42.43% vs VXF's -58.03%.
On 10-year performance, VXF leads with 12.99% vs 12.31% for SCHM. On fees, SCHM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VXF has performed better with a 12.99% return vs 12.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for VXF.
VXF has the higher dividend yield at 1.24%, compared with 1.21% for SCHM.
SCHM tracks Dow Jones US Total Stock Market Mid-Cap, while VXF tracks S&P Completion Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SCHM and 0.05% for VXF.
SCHM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHM and VXF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer