SCHM vs. SCHV
SCHM (Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF) and SCHV (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHM is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones US Total Stock Market Mid-Cap, while SCHV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHM returned 11.37%/yr vs 11.50%/yr for SCHV. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.04% expense ratio.
Performance
SCHM vs. SCHV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHM achieves a 19.05% return, which is significantly higher than SCHV's 15.39% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SCHM having a 11.37% annualized return and SCHV not far ahead at 11.50%.
SCHM
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 5.28%
- YTD
- 19.05%
- 6M
- 19.54%
- 1Y
- 32.45%
- 3Y*
- 18.14%
- 5Y*
- 8.07%
- 10Y*
- 11.37%
SCHV
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 5.65%
- YTD
- 15.39%
- 6M
- 16.00%
- 1Y
- 28.49%
- 3Y*
- 18.86%
- 5Y*
- 10.40%
- 10Y*
- 11.50%
SCHM vs. SCHV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHM Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF | 19.05% | 10.17% | 11.98% | 16.69% | -17.07% | 19.36% | 15.26% | 27.48% | -8.77% | 19.60% |
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF | 15.39% | 16.02% | 14.13% | 8.93% | -7.65% | 25.58% | 2.64% | 25.92% | -7.30% | 16.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHM and SCHV is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2011 | 0.90 |
The correlation between SCHM and SCHV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCHM vs. SCHV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHM
SCHV
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Technology
SCHM
SCHV
Industrials
SCHM
SCHV
Financial Services
SCHM
SCHV
Healthcare
SCHM
SCHV
Consumer Cyclical
SCHM
SCHV
Real Estate
SCHM
SCHV
Basic Materials
SCHM
SCHV
Consumer Defensive
SCHM
SCHV
Energy
SCHM
SCHV
Utilities
SCHM
SCHV
Communication Services
SCHM
SCHV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHM vs. SCHV — Risk / Return Rank
SCHM
SCHV
SCHM vs. SCHV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCHM | SCHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.09 | 2.69 | -0.60 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.94 | 3.84 | -0.89 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.48 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.50 | 4.19 | -0.69 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.11 | 16.96 | -2.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCHM | SCHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.09 | 2.69 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.72 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.68 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.72 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
SCHM vs. SCHV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHM drawdown since its inception was -42.43%, which is greater than SCHV's maximum drawdown of -37.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHM and SCHV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHM | SCHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.43% | -37.08% | -5.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.32% | -6.83% | -2.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.27% | -15.26% | -8.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.46% | -19.78% | -6.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.43% | -37.08% | -5.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.03% | 0.00% | -0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.66% | -3.83% | -1.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.31% | 1.69% | +0.62% |
Volatility
SCHM vs. SCHV - Volatility Comparison
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) has a higher volatility of 4.72% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) at 3.09%. This indicates that SCHM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHM | SCHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.72% | 3.09% | +1.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.74% | 8.13% | +3.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.62% | 10.63% | +4.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.56% | 14.51% | +5.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.46% | 16.94% | +3.52% |
SCHM vs. SCHV - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SCHM and SCHV have an expense ratio of 0.04%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHM vs. SCHV - Dividend Comparison
SCHM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, less than SCHV's 1.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHM Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF | 1.22% | 1.46% | 1.43% | 1.50% | 1.67% | 1.13% | 1.31% | 1.48% | 1.56% | 1.27% | 1.51% | 1.54% |
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF | 1.76% | 2.02% | 2.25% | 2.42% | 2.37% | 1.93% | 3.03% | 3.02% | 3.05% | 2.37% | 2.65% | 2.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHM and SCHV have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHM has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to SCHV (3.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHM dropped -42.43% vs SCHV's -37.08%.
On 10-year performance, SCHV leads with 11.50% vs 11.37% for SCHM. Both ETFs have the same 0.04% expense ratio. On volatility, SCHV has been the lower-risk option at 3.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHV has performed better with a 11.50% return vs 11.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHM and SCHV have the same expense ratio: 0.04% per year.
SCHV has the higher dividend yield at 1.76%, compared with 1.22% for SCHM.
SCHM is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while SCHV is Large Cap Value Equities. SCHM tracks Dow Jones US Total Stock Market Mid-Cap, while SCHV tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index.
SCHV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHM and SCHV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer