SCHM vs. IMCG
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG).
SCHM and IMCG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SCHM is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones US Total Stock Market Mid-Cap. It was launched on Jan 13, 2011. IMCG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Growth Index. It was launched on Jun 28, 2004. Both SCHM and IMCG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SCHM or IMCG.
Key characteristics
| SCHM | IMCG | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 3.01% | 4.01% |
| 1Y Return | 18.76% | 21.68% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 1.20% | 1.17% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 7.75% | 11.02% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 8.90% | 11.47% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.21 | 1.47 |
| Daily Std Dev | 15.24% | 14.60% |
| Max Drawdown | -42.43% | -58.96% |
| Current Drawdown | -5.03% | -10.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHM and IMCG is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
SCHM vs. IMCG - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, SCHM achieves a 3.01% return, which is significantly lower than IMCG's 4.01% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHM has underperformed IMCG with an annualized return of 8.90%, while IMCG has yielded a comparatively higher 11.47% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SCHM vs. IMCG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHM has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than IMCG's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SCHM vs. IMCG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SCHM vs. IMCG - Dividend Comparison
SCHM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, more than IMCG's 0.83% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHM Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF | 1.49% | 1.50% | 1.67% | 1.13% | 1.31% | 1.48% | 1.56% | 1.27% | 1.51% | 1.54% | 1.48% | 1.27% |
IMCG iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 0.83% | 0.85% | 0.91% | 0.41% | 0.09% | 0.29% | 0.35% | 0.45% | 0.52% | 0.38% | 0.60% | 0.36% |
Drawdowns
SCHM vs. IMCG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHM drawdown since its inception was -42.43%, smaller than the maximum IMCG drawdown of -58.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHM and IMCG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SCHM vs. IMCG - Volatility Comparison
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) have volatilities of 4.35% and 4.55%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.