PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHJ vs. SCHV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHJ vs. SCHV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHJ) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHJ achieves a 0.56% return, which is significantly lower than SCHV's 15.39% return.


SCHJ

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.13%
YTD
0.56%
6M
0.86%
1Y
4.52%
3Y*
5.49%
5Y*
2.31%
10Y*

SCHV

1D
0.09%
1M
5.65%
YTD
15.39%
6M
16.00%
1Y
28.49%
3Y*
18.86%
5Y*
10.40%
10Y*
11.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHJ vs. SCHV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SCHJ
Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF
0.56%6.80%4.89%6.36%-5.73%-0.67%5.30%0.61%
SCHV
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF
15.39%16.02%14.13%8.93%-7.65%25.58%2.64%9.39%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHJ and SCHV is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2019

0.21

The correlation between SCHJ and SCHV shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (all time) to 0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SCHJ vs. SCHV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHJ
SCHV

Financial Services

30.8%
19.6%

Technology

8.3%
18.2%

Healthcare

7.9%
11.3%

Industrials

7.2%
14.0%

Consumer Cyclical

6.8%
6.9%

Utilities

6.4%
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
8.8%

Communication Services

4.3%
2.5%

Real Estate

4.1%
4.1%

Energy

4.0%
7.2%

Basic Materials

1.4%
2.8%

Financial Services

SCHJ
30.8%
SCHV
19.6%

Technology

SCHJ
8.3%
SCHV
18.2%

Healthcare

SCHJ
7.9%
SCHV
11.3%

Industrials

SCHJ
7.2%
SCHV
14.0%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHJ
6.8%
SCHV
6.9%

Utilities

SCHJ
6.4%
SCHV
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

SCHJ
4.6%
SCHV
8.8%

Communication Services

SCHJ
4.3%
SCHV
2.5%

Real Estate

SCHJ
4.1%
SCHV
4.1%

Energy

SCHJ
4.0%
SCHV
7.2%

Basic Materials

SCHJ
1.4%
SCHV
2.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHJ vs. SCHV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHJ
SCHJ Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
SCHJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHJ Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHJ Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHV
SCHV Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
SCHV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHV Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHV Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHJ vs. SCHV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHJ) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCHJSCHVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.48

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

4.19

-1.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.17

16.96

-4.79

SCHJ vs. SCHV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the SCHV Sharpe Ratio of 2.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHJ and SCHV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCHJSCHVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42

2.69

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.72

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.72

-0.08

Drawdowns

SCHJ vs. SCHV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHJ drawdown since its inception was -13.62%, smaller than the maximum SCHV drawdown of -37.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHJ and SCHV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHJSCHVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.62%

-37.08%

+23.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.47%

-6.83%

+5.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.47%

-15.26%

+13.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.43%

-19.78%

+10.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

0.00%

-0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.88%

-3.83%

+1.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.37%

1.69%

-1.32%

Volatility

SCHJ vs. SCHV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHJ) is 0.55%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) has a volatility of 3.09%. This indicates that SCHJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHJSCHVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.55%

3.09%

-2.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.35%

8.13%

-6.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87%

10.63%

-8.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.94%

14.51%

-11.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.13%

16.94%

-12.81%

SCHJ vs. SCHV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHJ has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHJ vs. SCHV - Dividend Comparison

SCHJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%, more than SCHV's 1.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHJ
Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF
4.50%4.42%4.00%2.98%1.64%0.94%2.54%0.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHV
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF
1.76%2.02%2.25%2.42%2.37%1.93%3.03%3.02%3.05%2.37%2.65%2.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHJ and SCHV have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHV has higher volatility (3.09%) compared to SCHJ (0.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHJ dropped -13.62% vs SCHV's -37.08%.

On 5-year performance, SCHV leads with 10.40% vs 2.31% for SCHJ. On fees, SCHV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SCHV has performed better with a 10.40% return vs 2.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for SCHJ.

SCHJ has the higher dividend yield at 4.50%, compared with 1.76% for SCHV.

SCHJ is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while SCHV is Large Cap Value Equities. SCHJ tracks Bloomberg US Corporate (1-5 Y), while SCHV tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SCHJ and 0.04% for SCHV.

SCHV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 2.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHJ and SCHV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer