PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHH vs. PRFZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHH vs. PRFZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH) and Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF (PRFZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SCHH having a 16.33% return and PRFZ slightly lower at 15.55%. Over the past 10 years, SCHH has underperformed PRFZ with an annualized return of 4.51%, while PRFZ has yielded a comparatively higher 11.95% annualized return.


SCHH

1D
1.00%
1M
3.20%
YTD
16.33%
6M
16.33%
1Y
15.97%
3Y*
11.02%
5Y*
3.40%
10Y*
4.51%

PRFZ

1D
0.87%
1M
4.92%
YTD
15.55%
6M
12.59%
1Y
33.05%
3Y*
16.84%
5Y*
8.16%
10Y*
11.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHH vs. PRFZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHH
Schwab US REIT ETF
16.33%2.20%4.99%11.18%-24.99%41.07%-14.81%22.85%-4.26%3.68%
PRFZ
Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF
15.55%11.26%12.68%20.21%-16.29%28.26%11.84%21.91%-11.43%13.82%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHH and PRFZ is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2011

0.59

The correlation between SCHH and PRFZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.63 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SCHH vs. PRFZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHH
PRFZ

Real Estate

98.5%
6.7%

Basic Materials

1.3%
3.3%

Financial Services

0.2%
13.3%

Communication Services

-

2.7%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.5%

Energy

-

5.4%

Healthcare

-

16.4%

Industrials

-

16.7%

Technology

-

20.8%

Utilities

-

1.5%

Real Estate

SCHH
98.5%
PRFZ
6.7%

Basic Materials

SCHH
1.3%
PRFZ
3.3%

Financial Services

SCHH
0.2%
PRFZ
13.3%

Communication Services

SCHH

-

PRFZ
2.7%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHH

-

PRFZ
10.4%

Consumer Defensive

SCHH

-

PRFZ
2.5%

Energy

SCHH

-

PRFZ
5.4%

Healthcare

SCHH

-

PRFZ
16.4%

Industrials

SCHH

-

PRFZ
16.7%

Technology

SCHH

-

PRFZ
20.8%

Utilities

SCHH

-

PRFZ
1.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHH vs. PRFZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHH
SCHH Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
SCHH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHH Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHH Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHH Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

PRFZ
PRFZ Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
PRFZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRFZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRFZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
PRFZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRFZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHH vs. PRFZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH) and Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF (PRFZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCHHPRFZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.31

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.94

3.20

-1.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.10

11.02

-4.92

SCHH vs. PRFZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHH Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is lower than the PRFZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHH and PRFZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCHH vs. PRFZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHH drawdown since its inception was -44.22%, smaller than the maximum PRFZ drawdown of -62.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHH and PRFZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHHPRFZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.22%

-62.41%

+18.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.28%

-10.38%

+2.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.76%

-26.54%

+8.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.28%

-26.58%

-6.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.22%

-44.28%

+0.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.43%

-9.41%

-0.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.63%

3.01%

-0.38%

Volatility

SCHH vs. PRFZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH) is 4.83%, while Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF (PRFZ) has a volatility of 5.92%. This indicates that SCHH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRFZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHHPRFZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.83%

5.92%

-1.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.98%

12.93%

-2.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.56%

18.33%

-4.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.74%

21.38%

-2.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.99%

22.46%

-1.47%

SCHH vs. PRFZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHH has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than PRFZ's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCHH vs. PRFZ - Dividend Comparison

SCHH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, more than PRFZ's 0.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRFZ
Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF
0.82%0.82%1.45%1.42%1.33%0.93%0.91%1.29%1.37%0.97%1.31%1.39%
SCHH
Schwab US REIT ETF
2.69%3.04%3.22%3.24%2.55%1.50%2.86%2.86%3.64%2.22%2.81%2.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHH and PRFZ have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRFZ has higher volatility (5.92%) compared to SCHH (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHH dropped -44.22% vs PRFZ's -62.41%.

On 10-year performance, PRFZ leads with 11.95% vs 4.51% for SCHH. On fees, SCHH is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, SCHH has been the lower-risk option at 4.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PRFZ has performed better with a 11.95% return vs 4.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHH is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for PRFZ.

SCHH has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 0.82% for PRFZ.

SCHH is categorized as REIT, while PRFZ is Small Cap Blend Equities. SCHH tracks Dow Jones Equity All REIT Capped Index, while PRFZ tracks FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for SCHH and 0.39% for PRFZ.

PRFZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHH and PRFZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer