SCHH vs. PRFZ
SCHH (Schwab US REIT ETF) and PRFZ (Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHH is a REIT fund tracking the Dow Jones Equity All REIT Capped Index, while PRFZ is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHH returned 4.51%/yr vs 11.95%/yr for PRFZ. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCHH charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for PRFZ.
Performance
SCHH vs. PRFZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SCHH having a 16.33% return and PRFZ slightly lower at 15.55%. Over the past 10 years, SCHH has underperformed PRFZ with an annualized return of 4.51%, while PRFZ has yielded a comparatively higher 11.95% annualized return.
SCHH
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- 3.20%
- YTD
- 16.33%
- 6M
- 16.33%
- 1Y
- 15.97%
- 3Y*
- 11.02%
- 5Y*
- 3.40%
- 10Y*
- 4.51%
PRFZ
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 4.92%
- YTD
- 15.55%
- 6M
- 12.59%
- 1Y
- 33.05%
- 3Y*
- 16.84%
- 5Y*
- 8.16%
- 10Y*
- 11.95%
SCHH vs. PRFZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHH Schwab US REIT ETF | 16.33% | 2.20% | 4.99% | 11.18% | -24.99% | 41.07% | -14.81% | 22.85% | -4.26% | 3.68% |
PRFZ Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF | 15.55% | 11.26% | 12.68% | 20.21% | -16.29% | 28.26% | 11.84% | 21.91% | -11.43% | 13.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHH and PRFZ is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2011 | 0.59 |
The correlation between SCHH and PRFZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.63 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SCHH vs. PRFZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHH
PRFZ
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
SCHH
PRFZ
Basic Materials
SCHH
PRFZ
Financial Services
SCHH
PRFZ
Communication Services
SCHH
-
PRFZ
Consumer Cyclical
SCHH
-
PRFZ
Consumer Defensive
SCHH
-
PRFZ
Energy
SCHH
-
PRFZ
Healthcare
SCHH
-
PRFZ
Industrials
SCHH
-
PRFZ
Technology
SCHH
-
PRFZ
Utilities
SCHH
-
PRFZ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHH vs. PRFZ — Risk / Return Rank
SCHH
PRFZ
SCHH vs. PRFZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH) and Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF (PRFZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHH | PRFZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.31 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.94 | 3.20 | -1.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.10 | 11.02 | -4.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHH vs. PRFZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHH drawdown since its inception was -44.22%, smaller than the maximum PRFZ drawdown of -62.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHH and PRFZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHH | PRFZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.22% | -62.41% | +18.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.28% | -10.38% | +2.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.76% | -26.54% | +8.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.28% | -26.58% | -6.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.22% | -44.28% | +0.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.43% | -9.41% | -0.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.63% | 3.01% | -0.38% |
Volatility
SCHH vs. PRFZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH) is 4.83%, while Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF (PRFZ) has a volatility of 5.92%. This indicates that SCHH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRFZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHH | PRFZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.83% | 5.92% | -1.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.98% | 12.93% | -2.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.56% | 18.33% | -4.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.74% | 21.38% | -2.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.99% | 22.46% | -1.47% |
SCHH vs. PRFZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHH has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than PRFZ's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCHH vs. PRFZ - Dividend Comparison
SCHH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, more than PRFZ's 0.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRFZ Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF | 0.82% | 0.82% | 1.45% | 1.42% | 1.33% | 0.93% | 0.91% | 1.29% | 1.37% | 0.97% | 1.31% | 1.39% |
SCHH Schwab US REIT ETF | 2.69% | 3.04% | 3.22% | 3.24% | 2.55% | 1.50% | 2.86% | 2.86% | 3.64% | 2.22% | 2.81% | 2.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHH and PRFZ have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PRFZ has higher volatility (5.92%) compared to SCHH (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHH dropped -44.22% vs PRFZ's -62.41%.
On 10-year performance, PRFZ leads with 11.95% vs 4.51% for SCHH. On fees, SCHH is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, SCHH has been the lower-risk option at 4.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PRFZ has performed better with a 11.95% return vs 4.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHH is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for PRFZ.
SCHH has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 0.82% for PRFZ.
SCHH is categorized as REIT, while PRFZ is Small Cap Blend Equities. SCHH tracks Dow Jones Equity All REIT Capped Index, while PRFZ tracks FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for SCHH and 0.39% for PRFZ.
PRFZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHH and PRFZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer