PortfoliosLab logo
PRFZ vs. PWB
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between PRFZ and PWB is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

PRFZ vs. PWB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF (PRFZ) and Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PRFZ:

0.15

PWB:

0.89

Sortino Ratio

PRFZ:

0.43

PWB:

1.36

Omega Ratio

PRFZ:

1.06

PWB:

1.20

Calmar Ratio

PRFZ:

0.16

PWB:

0.97

Martin Ratio

PRFZ:

0.49

PWB:

3.43

Ulcer Index

PRFZ:

8.81%

PWB:

6.25%

Daily Std Dev

PRFZ:

23.44%

PWB:

23.51%

Max Drawdown

PRFZ:

-62.41%

PWB:

-52.57%

Current Drawdown

PRFZ:

-12.24%

PWB:

-3.27%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRFZ achieves a -4.79% return, which is significantly lower than PWB's 5.26% return. Over the past 10 years, PRFZ has underperformed PWB with an annualized return of 7.97%, while PWB has yielded a comparatively higher 13.74% annualized return.


PRFZ

YTD

-4.79%

1M

13.32%

6M

-11.36%

1Y

3.52%

5Y*

17.42%

10Y*

7.97%

PWB

YTD

5.26%

1M

14.40%

6M

1.97%

1Y

20.75%

5Y*

17.21%

10Y*

13.74%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PRFZ vs. PWB - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRFZ has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than PWB's 0.56% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

PRFZ vs. PWB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRFZ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PRFZ is 2424
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PRFZ is 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PRFZ is 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PRFZ is 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PRFZ is 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PRFZ is 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

PWB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PWB is 7878
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PWB is 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PWB is 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PWB is 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PWB is 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PWB is 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PRFZ vs. PWB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF (PRFZ) and Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current PRFZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.15, which is lower than the PWB Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRFZ and PWB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

PRFZ vs. PWB - Dividend Comparison

PRFZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, more than PWB's 0.07% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
PRFZ
Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF
1.42%1.45%1.42%1.33%0.93%0.91%1.29%1.37%0.97%1.31%1.39%1.14%
PWB
Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF
0.07%0.08%0.37%0.31%0.03%0.21%0.58%0.97%0.54%0.82%0.67%0.43%

Drawdowns

PRFZ vs. PWB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRFZ drawdown since its inception was -62.41%, which is greater than PWB's maximum drawdown of -52.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRFZ and PWB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

PRFZ vs. PWB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF (PRFZ) is 6.09%, while Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB) has a volatility of 6.98%. This indicates that PRFZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PWB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...