PRFZ vs. PWB
PRFZ (Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF) and PWB (Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PRFZ is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid Index, while PWB is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dynamic Large Cap Growth Intellidex Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PRFZ returned 12.21%/yr vs 19.14%/yr for PWB. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PRFZ charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for PWB.
Performance
PRFZ vs. PWB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRFZ achieves a 16.56% return, which is significantly lower than PWB's 32.57% return. Over the past 10 years, PRFZ has underperformed PWB with an annualized return of 12.21%, while PWB has yielded a comparatively higher 19.14% annualized return.
PRFZ
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 4.27%
- YTD
- 16.56%
- 6M
- 13.40%
- 1Y
- 36.25%
- 3Y*
- 18.70%
- 5Y*
- 8.61%
- 10Y*
- 12.21%
PWB
- 1D
- 1.13%
- 1M
- 8.92%
- YTD
- 32.57%
- 6M
- 30.75%
- 1Y
- 51.42%
- 3Y*
- 34.91%
- 5Y*
- 18.43%
- 10Y*
- 19.14%
PRFZ vs. PWB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRFZ Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF | 16.56% | 11.26% | 12.68% | 20.21% | -16.29% | 28.26% | 11.84% | 21.91% | -11.43% | 13.82% |
PWB Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF | 32.57% | 24.94% | 31.04% | 30.61% | -25.81% | 19.58% | 31.89% | 24.68% | 0.88% | 30.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRFZ and PWB is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2006 | 0.76 |
The correlation between PRFZ and PWB shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (3 years) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRFZ vs. PWB — Risk / Return Rank
PRFZ
PWB
PRFZ vs. PWB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF (PRFZ) and Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PRFZ | PWB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.43 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.51 | 4.27 | -0.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.08 | 17.82 | -5.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PRFZ vs. PWB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRFZ drawdown since its inception was -62.41%, which is greater than PWB's maximum drawdown of -52.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRFZ and PWB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRFZ | PWB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.41% | -52.58% | -9.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.38% | -12.11% | +1.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.54% | -22.10% | -4.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.58% | -31.41% | +4.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.28% | -32.36% | -11.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.40% | -8.22% | -1.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.01% | 2.89% | +0.12% |
Volatility
PRFZ vs. PWB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF (PRFZ) is 5.52%, while Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB) has a volatility of 9.11%. This indicates that PRFZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PWB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRFZ | PWB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.52% | 9.11% | -3.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.96% | 16.87% | -3.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.32% | 20.26% | -1.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.35% | 21.32% | +0.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.48% | 20.88% | +1.60% |
PRFZ vs. PWB - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRFZ has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than PWB's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
PRFZ vs. PWB - Dividend Comparison
PRFZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, while PWB has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRFZ Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF | 1.01% | 0.82% | 1.45% | 1.42% | 1.33% | 0.93% | 0.91% | 1.29% | 1.37% | 0.97% | 1.31% | 1.39% |
PWB Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.37% | 0.31% | 0.04% | 0.21% | 0.58% | 0.97% | 0.54% | 0.82% | 0.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PRFZ and PWB have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PWB has higher volatility (9.11%) compared to PRFZ (5.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRFZ dropped -62.41% vs PWB's -52.58%.
On 10-year performance, PWB leads with 19.14% vs 12.21% for PRFZ. On fees, PRFZ is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, PRFZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PWB has performed better with a 19.14% return vs 12.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PRFZ is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for PWB.
PRFZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.00% for PWB.
PRFZ is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while PWB is Large Cap Growth Equities. PRFZ tracks FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid Index, while PWB tracks Dynamic Large Cap Growth Intellidex Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for PRFZ and 0.56% for PWB.
PWB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PRFZ and PWB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer