PRFZ vs. SCHA

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

PRFZ (Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF) and SCHA (Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds - PRFZ tracks the FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid Index while SCHA tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PRFZ returned 12.21%/yr vs 11.91%/yr for SCHA. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. PRFZ charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHA.

Performance

PRFZ vs. SCHA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF (PRFZ) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRFZ achieves a 16.56% return, which is significantly lower than SCHA's 24.67% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PRFZ having a 12.21% annualized return and SCHA not far behind at 11.91%.

PRFZ

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 4.27%
• YTD: 16.56%
• 6M: 13.40%
• 1Y: 36.25%
• 3Y*: 18.70%
• 5Y*: 8.61%
• 10Y*: 12.21%

SCHA

• 1D: 0.77%
• 1M: 6.39%
• YTD: 24.67%
• 6M: 21.39%
• 1Y: 45.75%
• 3Y*: 20.54%
• 5Y*: 7.90%
• 10Y*: 11.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRFZ vs. SCHA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PRFZ Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF	16.56%	11.26%	12.68%	20.21%	-16.29%	28.26%	11.84%	21.91%	-11.43%	13.82%
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF	24.67%	11.60%	11.16%	18.46%	-19.81%	16.45%	19.34%	26.50%	-11.79%	14.94%

Correlation

The correlation between PRFZ and SCHA is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.98
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009	0.98

The correlation between PRFZ and SCHA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

PRFZ vs. SCHA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PRFZ	SCHA
Technology	19.6%	24.3%
Healthcare	16.8%	13.8%
Industrials	16.6%	15.4%
Financial Services	13.2%	15.4%
Consumer Cyclical	10.8%	9.2%
Real Estate	7.2%	5.8%
Energy	5.0%	4.8%
Basic Materials	3.5%	4.1%
Communication Services	2.9%	2.3%
Consumer Defensive	2.8%	2.5%
Utilities	1.5%	2.1%

Return for Risk

PRFZ vs. SCHA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRFZ

PRFZ Risk / Return Rank: 64
PRFZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
PRFZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
PRFZ Omega Ratio Rank: 55
PRFZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
PRFZ Martin Ratio Rank: 68

SCHA

SCHA Risk / Return Rank: 81
SCHA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
SCHA Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
SCHA Omega Ratio Rank: 72
SCHA Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
SCHA Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRFZ vs. SCHA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF (PRFZ) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PRFZ	SCHA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.99	2.46	-0.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.82	3.38	-0.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.41	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.51	4.84	-1.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.08	17.72	-5.64

PRFZ vs. SCHA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRFZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the SCHA Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRFZ and SCHA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PRFZ vs. SCHA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRFZ drawdown since its inception was -62.41%, which is greater than SCHA's maximum drawdown of -42.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRFZ and SCHA.

Drawdown Indicators

	PRFZ	SCHA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.41%	-42.41%	-20.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.38%	-9.50%	-0.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.54%	-27.29%	+0.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.58%	-30.79%	+4.21%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.28%	-42.41%	-1.87%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.40%	-7.56%	-1.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.01%	2.59%	+0.42%

Volatility

PRFZ vs. SCHA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF (PRFZ) is 5.52%, while Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) has a volatility of 6.45%. This indicates that PRFZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PRFZ	SCHA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.52%	6.45%	-0.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.96%	13.80%	-0.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.32%	18.71%	-0.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.35%	22.03%	-0.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.48%	22.78%	-0.30%

PRFZ vs. SCHA - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRFZ has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHA's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

PRFZ vs. SCHA - Dividend Comparison

PRFZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, more than SCHA's 0.96% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PRFZ Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF	1.01%	0.82%	1.45%	1.42%	1.33%	0.93%	0.91%	1.29%	1.37%	0.97%	1.31%	1.39%
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF	0.96%	1.26%	1.51%	1.42%	1.37%	1.19%	1.05%	1.39%	1.58%	1.24%	1.50%	1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PRFZ and SCHA in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, PRFZ and SCHA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, PRFZ or SCHA?

SCHA has higher volatility (6.45%) compared to PRFZ (5.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRFZ dropped -62.41% vs SCHA's -42.41%.

Which ETF is better, PRFZ or SCHA?

On 10-year performance, PRFZ leads with 12.21% vs 11.91% for SCHA. On fees, SCHA is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, PRFZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PRFZ or SCHA?

Over the 10-year period, PRFZ has performed better with a 12.21% return vs 11.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PRFZ or SCHA?

SCHA is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for PRFZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PRFZ or SCHA?

PRFZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.96% for SCHA.

What is the main difference between PRFZ and SCHA?

PRFZ tracks FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid Index, while SCHA tracks Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for PRFZ and 0.04% for SCHA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCHA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.