PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRFZ vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRFZ vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF (PRFZ) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRFZ achieves a 16.56% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 9.75% return. Over the past 10 years, PRFZ has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 12.21%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.77% annualized return.


PRFZ

1D
0.11%
1M
4.27%
YTD
16.56%
6M
13.40%
1Y
36.25%
3Y*
18.70%
5Y*
8.61%
10Y*
12.21%

VOO

1D
-0.29%
1M
0.08%
YTD
9.75%
6M
9.30%
1Y
26.77%
3Y*
21.36%
5Y*
13.58%
10Y*
15.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRFZ vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRFZ
Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF
16.56%11.26%12.68%20.21%-16.29%28.26%11.84%21.91%-11.43%13.82%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
9.75%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between PRFZ and VOO is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.83

The correlation between PRFZ and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

PRFZ vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PRFZ
VOO

Technology

19.6%
39.1%

Healthcare

16.8%
8.3%

Industrials

16.6%
7.6%

Financial Services

13.2%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.8%
9.8%

Real Estate

7.2%
1.8%

Energy

5.0%
3.2%

Basic Materials

3.5%
1.7%

Communication Services

2.9%
10.5%

Consumer Defensive

2.8%
4.5%

Utilities

1.5%
2.5%

Technology

PRFZ
19.6%
VOO
39.1%

Healthcare

PRFZ
16.8%
VOO
8.3%

Industrials

PRFZ
16.6%
VOO
7.6%

Financial Services

PRFZ
13.2%
VOO
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

PRFZ
10.8%
VOO
9.8%

Real Estate

PRFZ
7.2%
VOO
1.8%

Energy

PRFZ
5.0%
VOO
3.2%

Basic Materials

PRFZ
3.5%
VOO
1.7%

Communication Services

PRFZ
2.9%
VOO
10.5%

Consumer Defensive

PRFZ
2.8%
VOO
4.5%

Utilities

PRFZ
1.5%
VOO
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRFZ vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRFZ
PRFZ Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
PRFZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRFZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRFZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
PRFZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRFZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRFZ vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF (PRFZ) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRFZVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.39

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.51

3.02

+0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.08

13.58

-1.50

PRFZ vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRFZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRFZ and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRFZ vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRFZ drawdown since its inception was -62.41%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRFZ and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRFZVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.41%

-33.99%

-28.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.38%

-8.90%

-1.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.54%

-18.69%

-7.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.58%

-24.52%

-2.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.28%

-33.99%

-10.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.74%

+1.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.40%

-3.68%

-5.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.01%

1.98%

+1.03%

Volatility

PRFZ vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF (PRFZ) has a higher volatility of 5.52% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.60%. This indicates that PRFZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRFZVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.52%

4.60%

+0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.96%

9.73%

+3.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.32%

12.39%

+5.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.35%

16.90%

+4.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.48%

18.05%

+4.43%

PRFZ vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRFZ has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRFZ vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

PRFZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than VOO's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRFZ
Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF
1.01%0.82%1.45%1.42%1.33%0.93%0.91%1.29%1.37%0.97%1.31%1.39%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.04%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRFZ and VOO have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRFZ has higher volatility (5.52%) compared to VOO (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRFZ dropped -62.41% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.77% vs 12.21% for PRFZ. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 4.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.77% return vs 12.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for PRFZ.

VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 1.01% for PRFZ.

PRFZ is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. PRFZ tracks FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for PRFZ and 0.03% for VOO.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRFZ and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer