SCHH vs. FMAT

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

SCHH (Schwab US REIT ETF) and FMAT (Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHH is a REIT fund tracking the Dow Jones Equity All REIT Capped Index, while FMAT is a Materials fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Materials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHH returned 4.51%/yr vs 10.55%/yr for FMAT. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCHH charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FMAT.

Performance

SCHH vs. FMAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH) and Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF (FMAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHH achieves a 16.33% return, which is significantly higher than FMAT's 13.63% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHH has underperformed FMAT with an annualized return of 4.51%, while FMAT has yielded a comparatively higher 10.55% annualized return.

SCHH

• 1D: 1.00%
• 1M: 3.60%
• YTD: 16.33%
• 6M: 16.33%
• 1Y: 17.06%
• 3Y*: 11.02%
• 5Y*: 3.40%
• 10Y*: 4.51%

FMAT

• 1D: 1.73%
• 1M: 0.43%
• YTD: 13.63%
• 6M: 14.23%
• 1Y: 23.84%
• 3Y*: 11.38%
• 5Y*: 6.23%
• 10Y*: 10.55%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHH vs. FMAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SCHH Schwab US REIT ETF	16.33%	2.20%	4.99%	11.18%	-24.99%	41.07%	-14.81%	22.85%	-4.26%	3.68%
FMAT Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF	13.63%	12.11%	0.47%	13.71%	-11.54%	27.45%	19.57%	23.35%	-17.40%	23.51%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHH and FMAT is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.57
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013	0.51

The correlation between SCHH and FMAT shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.61 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SCHH vs. FMAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SCHH	FMAT
Real Estate	98.5%	-
Basic Materials	1.3%	90.1%
Financial Services	0.2%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	8.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	0.1%
Energy	-	0.6%
Healthcare	-	0.5%
Industrials	-	0.1%
Technology	-	0.1%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

SCHH vs. FMAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHH

SCHH Risk / Return Rank: 39
SCHH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
SCHH Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
SCHH Omega Ratio Rank: 36
SCHH Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
SCHH Martin Ratio Rank: 43

FMAT

FMAT Risk / Return Rank: 37
FMAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
FMAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
FMAT Omega Ratio Rank: 35
FMAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
FMAT Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHH vs. FMAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH) and Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF (FMAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SCHH	FMAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.18	1.20	-0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.68	1.76	-0.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.21	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.94	1.65	+0.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.10	5.27	+0.83

SCHH vs. FMAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHH Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is comparable to the FMAT Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHH and FMAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SCHH vs. FMAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHH drawdown since its inception was -44.22%, which is greater than FMAT's maximum drawdown of -41.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHH and FMAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCHH	FMAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.22%	-41.11%	-3.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.28%	-13.48%	+5.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.76%	-23.17%	+5.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.28%	-25.40%	-7.88%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.22%	-41.11%	-3.11%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-3.48%	+3.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.43%	-6.87%	-2.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.63%	4.21%	-1.58%

Volatility

SCHH vs. FMAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH) is 4.83%, while Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF (FMAT) has a volatility of 7.54%. This indicates that SCHH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCHH	FMAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.83%	7.54%	-2.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.98%	14.80%	-4.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.56%	18.44%	-4.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.74%	19.74%	-1.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.99%	21.25%	-0.26%

SCHH vs. FMAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHH has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than FMAT's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SCHH vs. FMAT - Dividend Comparison

SCHH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, more than FMAT's 1.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FMAT Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF	1.41%	1.64%	1.68%	1.71%	2.00%	1.44%	1.73%	1.89%	2.18%	1.53%	1.78%	2.16%
SCHH Schwab US REIT ETF	2.69%	3.04%	3.22%	3.24%	2.55%	1.50%	2.86%	2.86%	3.64%	2.22%	2.81%	2.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCHH and FMAT in my portfolio?

SCHH and FMAT have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SCHH or FMAT?

FMAT has higher volatility (7.54%) compared to SCHH (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHH dropped -44.22% vs FMAT's -41.11%.

Which ETF is better, SCHH or FMAT?

On 10-year performance, FMAT leads with 10.55% vs 4.51% for SCHH. On fees, SCHH is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, SCHH has been the lower-risk option at 4.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SCHH or FMAT?

Over the 10-year period, FMAT has performed better with a 10.55% return vs 4.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SCHH or FMAT?

SCHH is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for FMAT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SCHH or FMAT?

SCHH has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 1.41% for FMAT.

What is the main difference between SCHH and FMAT?

SCHH is categorized as REIT, while FMAT is Materials. SCHH tracks Dow Jones Equity All REIT Capped Index, while FMAT tracks MSCI USA IMI Materials Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for SCHH and 0.08% for FMAT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FMAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.