SCHG vs. SIVR

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) and SIVR (abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index, while SIVR is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHG returned 18.85%/yr vs 14.57%/yr for SIVR. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SCHG charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for SIVR.

Performance

SCHG vs. SIVR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) and abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHG achieves a 5.03% return, which is significantly higher than SIVR's -1.40% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHG has outperformed SIVR with an annualized return of 18.85%, while SIVR has yielded a comparatively lower 14.57% annualized return.

SCHG

• 1D: 2.39%
• 1M: -0.12%
• YTD: 5.03%
• 6M: 5.98%
• 1Y: 23.20%
• 3Y*: 23.27%
• 5Y*: 14.85%
• 10Y*: 18.85%

SIVR

• 1D: 3.51%
• 1M: -8.06%
• YTD: -1.40%
• 6M: 9.35%
• 1Y: 92.86%
• 3Y*: 42.25%
• 5Y*: 20.46%
• 10Y*: 14.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHG vs. SIVR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	5.03%	17.50%	34.95%	50.10%	-31.80%	28.11%	39.14%	36.02%	-1.36%	28.05%
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF	-1.40%	145.34%	21.08%	-0.91%	2.59%	-12.33%	47.52%	15.17%	-8.96%	5.97%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHG and SIVR is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.28
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.23
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.20
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2009	0.19

Return for Risk

SCHG vs. SIVR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHG

SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 40
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 44
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 34

SIVR

SIVR Risk / Return Rank: 44
SIVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
SIVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
SIVR Omega Ratio Rank: 54
SIVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
SIVR Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHG vs. SIVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) and abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SCHG	SIVR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.45	1.56	-0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.98	1.85	+0.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.31	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.42	2.06	-0.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.68	4.44	+0.25

SCHG vs. SIVR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHG Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is comparable to the SIVR Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHG and SIVR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SCHG vs. SIVR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHG drawdown since its inception was -34.59%, smaller than the maximum SIVR drawdown of -75.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHG and SIVR.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCHG	SIVR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.59%	-75.85%	+41.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.41%	-45.33%	+28.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.39%	-45.33%	+21.94%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.59%	-45.33%	+10.74%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.59%	-45.33%	+10.74%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.06%	-39.85%	+36.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.20%	-47.83%	+42.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.97%	21.00%	-16.03%

Volatility

SCHG vs. SIVR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) is 5.59%, while abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) has a volatility of 16.52%. This indicates that SCHG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SIVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCHG	SIVR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.59%	16.52%	-10.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.52%	59.14%	-46.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.09%	59.96%	-43.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.35%	36.53%	-14.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.60%	32.05%	-10.45%

SCHG vs. SIVR - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than SIVR's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

SCHG vs. SIVR - Dividend Comparison

SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, while SIVR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	0.37%	0.36%	0.39%	0.46%	0.55%	0.42%	0.52%	0.82%	1.27%	1.01%	1.04%	1.22%
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCHG and SIVR in my portfolio?

SCHG and SIVR have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SCHG or SIVR?

SIVR has higher volatility (16.52%) compared to SCHG (5.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHG dropped -34.59% vs SIVR's -75.85%.

Which ETF is better, SCHG or SIVR?

On 10-year performance, SCHG leads with 18.85% vs 14.57% for SIVR. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHG has been the lower-risk option at 5.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SCHG or SIVR?

Over the 10-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 18.85% return vs 14.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SCHG or SIVR?

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for SIVR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SCHG or SIVR?

SCHG has the higher dividend yield at 0.37%, compared with 0.00% for SIVR.

What is the main difference between SCHG and SIVR?

SCHG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SIVR is Silver. SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index, while SIVR tracks LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt). They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and abrdn. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SCHG and 0.30% for SIVR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SIVR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.