SCHG vs. RWK

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) and RWK (Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index, while RWK is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Revenue-Weighted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHG returned 18.53%/yr vs 12.66%/yr for RWK. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCHG charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for RWK.

Performance

SCHG vs. RWK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHG achieves a 3.75% return, which is significantly lower than RWK's 12.60% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHG has outperformed RWK with an annualized return of 18.53%, while RWK has yielded a comparatively lower 12.66% annualized return.

SCHG

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: -0.94%
• YTD: 3.75%
• 6M: 2.93%
• 1Y: 20.82%
• 3Y*: 24.03%
• 5Y*: 14.90%
• 10Y*: 18.53%

RWK

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 1.42%
• YTD: 12.60%
• 6M: 12.51%
• 1Y: 26.47%
• 3Y*: 16.89%
• 5Y*: 10.58%
• 10Y*: 12.66%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHG vs. RWK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	3.75%	17.50%	34.95%	50.10%	-31.80%	28.11%	39.14%	36.02%	-1.36%	28.05%
RWK Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF	12.60%	10.27%	11.94%	23.76%	-8.19%	34.31%	11.06%	28.20%	-14.65%	13.39%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHG and RWK is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.54
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2009	0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between SCHG and RWK has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SCHG vs. RWK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SCHG	RWK
Technology	46.3%	14.0%
Communication Services	16.0%	0.7%
Consumer Cyclical	12.7%	20.7%
Healthcare	7.7%	4.0%
Financial Services	6.7%	13.1%
Industrials	5.8%	21.8%
Consumer Defensive	1.7%	11.3%
Basic Materials	1.4%	4.7%
Energy	0.8%	5.3%
Real Estate	0.5%	2.8%
Utilities	0.4%	1.6%

Return for Risk

SCHG vs. RWK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHG

SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 36
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 40
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 32

RWK

RWK Risk / Return Rank: 52
RWK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
RWK Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
RWK Omega Ratio Rank: 49
RWK Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
RWK Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHG vs. RWK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SCHG	RWK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.33	1.60	-0.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.82	2.41	-0.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.28	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.27	2.39	-1.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.25	7.67	-3.42
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SCHG vs. RWK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHG Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is comparable to the RWK Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHG and RWK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SCHG	RWK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.33	1.60	-0.27
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67	0.50	+0.17
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.86	0.55	+0.31
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.83	0.48	+0.36

Drawdowns

SCHG vs. RWK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHG drawdown since its inception was -34.59%, smaller than the maximum RWK drawdown of -56.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHG and RWK.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCHG	RWK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.59%	-56.49%	+21.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.41%	-11.14%	-5.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.39%	-24.58%	+1.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.59%	-24.58%	-10.01%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.59%	-46.20%	+11.61%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.25%	-0.99%	-3.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.20%	-7.55%	+2.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.91%	3.46%	+1.45%

Volatility

SCHG vs. RWK - Volatility Comparison

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a higher volatility of 4.52% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK) at 4.08%. This indicates that SCHG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RWK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCHG	RWK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.52%	4.08%	+0.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.02%	11.88%	+0.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.77%	16.67%	-0.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.31%	21.13%	+1.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.58%	22.95%	-1.37%

SCHG vs. RWK - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than RWK's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

SCHG vs. RWK - Dividend Comparison

SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than RWK's 1.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RWK Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF	1.13%	1.25%	1.11%	1.05%	1.18%	0.85%	0.96%	1.09%	1.22%	0.99%	1.30%	0.92%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	0.37%	0.36%	0.39%	0.46%	0.55%	0.42%	0.52%	0.82%	1.27%	1.01%	1.04%	1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCHG and RWK in my portfolio?

SCHG and RWK have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SCHG or RWK?

SCHG has higher volatility (4.52%) compared to RWK (4.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHG dropped -34.59% vs RWK's -56.49%.

Which ETF is better, SCHG or RWK?

On 10-year performance, SCHG leads with 18.53% vs 12.66% for RWK. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, RWK has been the lower-risk option at 4.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SCHG or RWK?

Over the 10-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 18.53% return vs 12.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SCHG or RWK?

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for RWK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SCHG or RWK?

RWK has the higher dividend yield at 1.13%, compared with 0.37% for SCHG.

What is the main difference between SCHG and RWK?

SCHG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while RWK is Small Cap Blend Equities. SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index, while RWK tracks S&P MidCap 400 Revenue-Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SCHG and 0.39% for RWK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RWK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.