PortfoliosLab logo
RWK vs. PRN
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between RWK and PRN is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

RWK vs. PRN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK) and Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

RWK:

0.07

PRN:

0.31

Sortino Ratio

RWK:

0.25

PRN:

0.60

Omega Ratio

RWK:

1.03

PRN:

1.08

Calmar Ratio

RWK:

0.05

PRN:

0.27

Martin Ratio

RWK:

0.16

PRN:

0.68

Ulcer Index

RWK:

8.06%

PRN:

12.32%

Daily Std Dev

RWK:

22.82%

PRN:

28.28%

Max Drawdown

RWK:

-56.49%

PRN:

-59.88%

Current Drawdown

RWK:

-10.55%

PRN:

-16.49%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RWK achieves a -2.93% return, which is significantly higher than PRN's -3.62% return. Over the past 10 years, RWK has underperformed PRN with an annualized return of 9.52%, while PRN has yielded a comparatively higher 12.49% annualized return.


RWK

YTD

-2.93%

1M

6.30%

6M

-9.94%

1Y

0.29%

3Y*

9.74%

5Y*

18.35%

10Y*

9.52%

PRN

YTD

-3.62%

1M

6.80%

6M

-16.49%

1Y

8.16%

3Y*

18.56%

5Y*

17.26%

10Y*

12.49%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RWK vs. PRN - Expense Ratio Comparison

RWK has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than PRN's 0.60% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

RWK vs. PRN — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RWK
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RWK is 1818
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RWK is 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RWK is 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RWK is 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RWK is 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RWK is 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

PRN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PRN is 3030
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PRN is 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PRN is 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PRN is 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PRN is 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PRN is 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

RWK vs. PRN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK) and Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current RWK Sharpe Ratio is 0.07, which is lower than the PRN Sharpe Ratio of 0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RWK and PRN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

RWK vs. PRN - Dividend Comparison

RWK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, more than PRN's 0.36% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
RWK
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF
1.20%1.11%1.05%1.18%0.85%0.96%1.09%1.22%0.74%1.30%0.92%1.03%
PRN
Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF
0.36%0.39%0.52%0.82%0.11%0.10%0.41%0.29%0.60%0.57%0.44%0.35%

Drawdowns

RWK vs. PRN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWK drawdown since its inception was -56.49%, smaller than the maximum PRN drawdown of -59.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWK and PRN.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

RWK vs. PRN - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK) has a higher volatility of 6.05% compared to Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) at 5.68%. This indicates that RWK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...