RWK vs. RFV
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV).
RWK and RFV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RWK is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Revenue-Weighted Index. It was launched on Feb 22, 2008. RFV is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P Mid Cap 400 Pure Value. It was launched on Mar 1, 2006. Both RWK and RFV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RWK or RFV.
Correlation
The correlation between RWK and RFV is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
RWK vs. RFV - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
RWK:
0.80
RFV:
0.34
RWK:
1.22
RFV:
0.60
RWK:
1.15
RFV:
1.07
RWK:
1.55
RFV:
0.67
RWK:
4.17
RFV:
1.42
RWK:
3.20%
RFV:
4.38%
RWK:
16.78%
RFV:
18.46%
RWK:
-56.49%
RFV:
-71.82%
RWK:
-8.03%
RFV:
-8.58%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RWK achieves a 11.72% return, which is significantly higher than RFV's 4.11% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RWK having a 10.34% annualized return and RFV not far behind at 9.95%.
RWK
11.72%
-3.07%
5.77%
12.08%
13.55%
10.34%
RFV
4.11%
-3.44%
7.93%
4.66%
13.49%
9.95%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RWK vs. RFV - Expense Ratio Comparison
RWK has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than RFV's 0.35% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
RWK vs. RFV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
RWK vs. RFV - Dividend Comparison
RWK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than RFV's 0.98% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RWK Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF | 0.83% | 1.05% | 1.18% | 0.85% | 0.96% | 1.09% | 1.22% | 0.74% | 1.30% | 0.92% | 1.03% | 1.29% |
RFV Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF | 0.98% | 1.27% | 2.05% | 1.60% | 1.52% | 1.71% | 1.39% | 1.36% | 0.88% | 1.79% | 1.19% | 0.80% |
Drawdowns
RWK vs. RFV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RWK drawdown since its inception was -56.49%, smaller than the maximum RFV drawdown of -71.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWK and RFV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
RWK vs. RFV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK) is 5.27%, while Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV) has a volatility of 5.65%. This indicates that RWK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RFV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.